Condoms a dead man 
          walking
          
          
          
By Fr. ROY CIMAGALA
April 
          12, 2010
          
          “…it is still being 
          foisted as a means to combat the dreaded HIV-AIDS, hyped now to become 
          an epidemic, giving the impression the condom is the last resort…”
          
          Health Secretary 
          Esperanza Cabral continues to distribute condoms and to amend her 
          justifications for doing so, depending on her audience. I have already 
          lost track of how many layers of rationalizations she had cleverly 
          done. 
          
          She’s a smart lady. I 
          wish to congratulate her, not for what she is doing in this particular 
          case, but for being shrewd. Remember that our Lord also praised the 
          unjust steward not for his misdeed but for his imaginative effort to 
          secure his future once he is dismissed for wasting his master’s goods. 
          (Lk 16,1-8)
          
          This is, of course, a 
          most tricky situation, since we can easily go overboard. But we just 
          have to learn to handle this circumstance, since it’s part of what our 
          Lord said about being “wise as serpents and simple as doves.” (Mt 
          10,16)
          
          Still, we have to be 
          clear and prompt in distinguishing between right and wrong, good and 
          evil. Everything, for sure, will have to be done with utmost charity, 
          delicacy and refinement, especially in the grey areas. But the 
          distinction has to be made.
          
          In the episode of the 
          woman caught in adultery, our Lord showed mercy, but told her to “sin 
          no more.” There is mercy, but that mercy is not supposed to overturn 
          the moral law.
          
          This is the law that 
          governs us all, since it is universal and immutable. I hate to say 
          this, since I feel it’s so basic it should be presumed at all times. 
          But as we all know, the world is now so flung in confusion that even 
          the moral and ethical one-plus-one needs to be explained.
          
          In this issue of the 
          condoms, a ridiculously simple question that does not deserve a 
          front-page treatment, the crux is first of all, as it should be in 
          everything else, whether it is morally right to use it, let alone, to 
          distribute it indiscriminately.
          
          The moral test is 
          basic and indispensable. When something fails that test, it cannot go 
          first base, much less, expect a home run. It is disqualified right at 
          the start. It’s dead in the water. No practical advantage can displace 
          this requirement.
          
          That it is still being 
          foisted as a means to combat the dreaded HIV-AIDS, hyped now to become 
          an epidemic, giving the impression the condom is the last resort, the 
          ultimate redeemer, etc., is converting that piece of latex into a dead 
          man walking, taking a longer route, past its due execution and 
          interment.
          
          This is stretching 
          things beyond the limits. The condom is an ant made to posture as an 
          elephant. It’s a blind, long shot and dangerous measure. Even its 
          practical effectivity is seriously, that is, scientifically, put to 
          doubt.
          
          You don’t solve a 
          serious moral problem with a mere prophylactic. And we cannot appeal 
          to the argument that Cabral, being a public official, need not bother 
          too much about morals, since she is limited to the practical aspects 
          of the problem. She is just doing her job. Leave her alone. That’s a 
          flat no.
          
          That’s why I feel 
          uneasy when some Church officials gave the impression they were 
          playing footsie with Cabral in this issue. I was disturbed to read in 
          the papers recently that some personnel of the social action group of 
          the Bishops’ Conference were doing just that.
          
          Cabral went to town 
          telling everyone she was happy the Church finally gave some approval 
          to the condom project. Or that in this issue, there is an area of 
          shared interest between her and the Church.
          
          Of course, we may have 
          to take that news with a grain of salt. The media cannot be fully 
          trusted to reflect the objective reality on the ground. Still, it can 
          cause a degree of apprehension.
          
          It’s not a question of 
          whether the Church should cooperate with the government in a 
          particular project. That cooperation should always be presumed, but 
          always in the way that’s in keeping with our faith and morals.
          
          In the agora of public 
          opinion, the Church’s distinctive contribution is precisely the moral 
          and ethical aspect of a given issue. Once that test is passed, the 
          Church not only respects but also fosters the variety of views and 
          options everyone is free to take.
          
          We may have to look 
          more closely into the qualifications of these Church officials. 
          Clearly, good intentions and past heroic acts are not enough. 
          Competence, doctrinal fidelity and tested prudence should be upheld.
          
          With all the sex 
          scandals hounding the Church now, we have more than enough problems 
          without getting enmeshed in this condom ruse.
           
          
           
          
           
          
           
          
          
          The essence of Araw ng 
          Kagitingan
          
          By Philippine Information Agency (PIA 8)
          April 
          9, 2010
          
          Apart from knowing that the reason for the nationwide holiday on 
          April 9 is because of the commemoration of the "Araw ng Kagitingan" 
          (Day of Valor), the young people of the Philippines must realize the 
          significance of this occasion. 
          
          On April 9, as the 
          whole country celebrates the Filipino gallantry, bravery and heroism, 
          the country pays tribute not only to the war heroes many of whom gave 
          up their lives during World War II but also to the veterans who fought 
          in the name of freedom.
          
          Bataan was the last 
          province to surrender to the Japanese invaders during the War. The 
          Battle of Bataan saw local forces alongside American allies engaging 
          in war against the Japanese. After the Fall came the infamous Death 
          March--a long and difficult walk from Mariveles, Bataan to Capas, 
          Tarlac that the captured Filipino and American soldiers were subjected 
          to. For many, it was fatal; almost 10,000 fatigued and starved 
          warriors perished along the trail.
          
          The march, involving 
          the forcible transfer of 90,000 to 100,000 American and Filipino 
          prisoners of war captured by the Japanese in the Philippines from the 
          Bataan peninsula to prison camps, was characterized by wide-ranging 
          physical abuse, murder, savagery, and resulted in very high fatalities 
          inflicted upon the prisoners and civilians along the route by the 
          armed forces of the Empire of Japan.
          
          Beheadings, cut 
          throats and being casually shot were the more common and merciful 
          actions – compared to bayonet stabbings, rapes, gutting 
          (disembowelments), numerous rifle butt beatings and a deliberate 
          refusal to allow the prisoners food or water while keeping them 
          continually marching for nearly a week (for the slowest survivors) in 
          tropical heat. Falling down, unable to continue moving was tantamount 
          to a death sentence, as was any degree of protest or expression of 
          displeasure.
          
          As a fitting tribute 
          to the heroism of these Filipino heroes, a 60-foot cross was erected 
          on Mount Samat in Pilar, Bataan. It is now a World War II military 
          shrine called the Dambana ng Kagitingan (Shrine of Valor). Completed 
          and inaugurated in 1970, the Dambana ng Kagitingan consists of the 
          Colonnade and the huge Memorial Cross. The Colonnade is a 
          marble-capped structure with an altar, esplanade (walkway) and a 
          museum.
          
          These days, the 
          Filipinos are not being required to do the same act of heroism, the 
          best proof of patriotism and love of country. All that is asked is for 
          the Filipino youth to be guided by the gallantry and valor of the 
          World War II Veterans. 
          
          Nowadays, the 
          Filipinos are fighting another kind of war, that of selecting and 
          electing the political leaders of the country in May 2010. The 
          challenge is for the youth and the Filipino people as a whole to shift 
          their paradigms of resignation and indifference, of helplessness and 
          indifference into awareness of their opportunity and responsibility to 
          make a difference by voting the right leaders transcending 
          self-serving interests into the noble purpose of nation-building, from 
          the myopic ambition of selfishness to the magnanimous care and genuine 
          concern for others.
          
          It is hoped that the 
          Filipino youth and all Filipinos for that matter will look up at the 
          Filipino veteran as their guide in choosing the right leaders who will 
          lead the nation towards unity, peace and progress.
           
          
           
          
           
          
           
          
          
          Sex education for 
          children, YES, of course!
          
          
          
By CHITO DELA TORRE
April 
          7, 2010
          
          A text message from a 
          radio announcer in a city in Region VIII (Eastern Visayas) asked me on March 24 this question: “may I ask 
          ur commnt pls r u n 
          favor 2d stand of d new educ sec, mona valisno dat sex educ should b 
          taught n schools so d studnts would learn rsponsble fmily planning”. 
           My reply: “I am in favor that sex education should be taught now in 
          hischls and colleges. Even for Grave V and VI. Since 1964, I’ve been 
          observing that boys and girls already knew what to do with sex during 
          their elementary days.  In my own case, I already knew a lot at age 6. 
          THANKS to my teacher parents and my Catechism tutors in Basey.  
          Neighbor children of my age then learned about sex, frm people in the 
          streets.  Thanks for your query.”
          
          The same announcer 
          asked on March 25: “Can I ask 
          ur commnt pls? wht can u say bout GMAs statmnt dat she wants 
          mguindanao msscre case b  resolvd by june 30? labi n na baga ngmingaw 
          man ine n kaso?”  My reply: “PGMA’s decision is a result of leadership 
          in crisis, lack of wisdom, absence of veritable desire and will to put 
          an end to a problem in the acceptable shortest desirable time.  Things 
          like the Ampatuan’s must not be prolonged in the name of conscientious 
          justice.”
          
          Back to the subject 
          matter in the first paragraph here, in both rural and urban areas, 
          everywhere I went around the Philippines between 1962 and 2010, there 
          were children, mostly boys, of primary education years, who exchanged 
          thoughts about what humans of opposite sexes talk about their sexes, 
          even more seriously than adolescents and adults do.  The exchange 
          would always take place after they get entangled in children’s games 
          that develop into a verbal tussle fanned by dissatisfaction over what 
          one or others did during their games.
          
          In some cases, boys 
          and girls, while resting from a hide-and-seek or touch-and-run game, 
          chat about what one’s parents do and whose parents do better in sex.  
          Very seldom would an adult who chance to hear their tsismis 
          ever stop them from discussing further that matter.  Instead, there 
          are instances when the adults fuel up further the argumentation by 
          teasing the boys and girls one after the other.
          
          In my childhood days, 
          adults were always the parents of the arguing children.  When they 
          join the discussion, and the discussion worsens into an altercation, 
          an imbroglio occurs between the parents.  When only the male parents 
          would decide to settle the issue between themselves, streets soon 
          become an arena of warring men, each with a long, sharp-bladed weapon 
          (sundang or sansibar) or sometimes the other armed with 
          a sugob or bulos (both meaning spear) or with a 
          pakang (the spined backbone of a pawikan (green turtle), 
          and very, very rarely would there be fisticuffs – although, very, very 
          seldom would the exchange of stashing blows, hacks and thrusts leave 
          any trace of blood from either of the protagonists, which makes the 
          whole scene funny and entertaining, but not welcome.
          
          Some of my male 
          classmates in Grade IV used to find time to mimic what male adults do 
          to satisfy themselves sexually. 
          
          Between years 2004 and 
          2010, in a neighborhood in Tacloban highly urbanized city, two young 
          girls who have failed to get a second year high school education got 
          pregnant.  Their impregnators were also young boys.  Asked once, one 
          of the two girls confided that she and her boy knew what they were 
          doing, and that even if they knew so much about the government’s 
          family planning thrusts, their poverty, or simply, their being part of 
          an abandoned social microcosm, cannot do anything but live with life, 
          whether as a risk or in abandon.  The younger girl is pregnant for the 
          second time, with another boy.  Her fist pregnancy failed into a mere 
          fetus, mostly blood.  No, the pornographic movies and video tapes had 
          nothing to do with what forced them to do sex.  It was not even pure 
          lust and craving for libido.  Theirs was an effect of a government 
          that always fails to look down the level of the hopeless in society, 
          and that prefers only the educated to get close to an employment 
          opportunity while feeding the hapless only once or twice in 365 days, 
          or that is blinded by the so-called global demand for this or that 
          which necessitates the continued emergence of superstructures in Metro 
          Manila while crop lands could not be irrigated and human communities 
          could not be saved from flash floods or mere flooding brought about by 
          a brief rain.
          
          Between 2000 and 2004, 
          I had worked with a small group that looked into the plight of minor 
          women – some of them aged 11, some from the island barrios and towns, 
          whose poverty and the unemployment of their parents, or the absence of 
          veritably reliable livelihood sources for their parents, forced them 
          to be pliant to enticements for greener pastures in Metro Manila, 
          where they would end up as sex slaves or characters of forced labor.  
          Some of the young women were forced to earn a living from prostitution 
          because police officer so and so threatened them to and because the 
          government was never around to protect or save them when they needed 
          it.  They knew so much about sex before they reached 10 years old, 
          from the elder and older people who talk about sex and even do sex 
          while others are knowingly watching from somewhere.
          
          And there are other 
          worse stories, becoming worst.  The government cannot do so much.  Its 
          eyes and hands are focus on “other top priorities”.  The “untrained” 
          locals have to be left to themselves to manage their own problems – 
          inescapably, that’s what the abandoning government is trying to tell.
          
          Yet, I endorse sex 
          education.  One that should not only be catered to high school 
          students, but also to pupils in the primary and elementary schools.  
          But, the first requirement should be that the Department of Education 
          should be able to convince us all that it is ready with that which it 
          sees is a solution to the problem that is supposed to be addressed by 
          sex education.  Readiness has measures in management and in advocacy.  
          If this is not available at an appreciable level, then the DepEd’s 
          thrust still lacks so much.
          
          My mentors in my 
          childhood were correct in their approach.  Parents should not leave 
          their children alone with their peers.  Teachers should keep their 
          pupils always busy.  Society should make time profitable and precious 
          to all, including those below 6 years old.  The DepEd should present 
          its curriculum first to the public for scrutiny.  Clean.
          
          And yes, keeping 
          busy is the answer.  When one has nothing to do, he or she begins to 
          do things that should not be done.  There’s wisdom in this that 
          someone had said a long time ago: an empty mind is a devil’s workshop.
           
          
           
          
           
          
           
          
          
          EASTER MESSAGE of 
          Bishop Leonardo Yuzon Medroso
          
          
          
By CHITO DELA TORRE
April 
          4, 2010
          
          For today’s Easter 
          Message, I take liberty in sharing with all readers this piece which 
          71-year old Bishop Leonardo Yuzon Medroso wrote in year 2008 ---
          
          As the light of the 
          Paschal Candle pierces through the murky night of Holy Saturday, 
          ushering on its break the lilting mood of the Easter Vigil that exudes 
          in the song of the “Exsultet”, the people of faith plunges once again 
          into the deep darkness of the Liturgy of the Word to carefully listen 
          to the words of promise and of hope. It is in this holy darkness that 
          the word of God starts again dispelling the chilling fear of death 
          that has for so long terrorized the heart of man, slowly filling it up 
          in an ever increasing intensity with the message of ‘God cares’ and 
          ‘God saves His people’, that soon would blare into the proclamation of 
          the resurrection of Jesus, bursting into songs of jubilation and 
          “alleluia”. For Christ is Risen! Christ is truly risen! HAPPY EASTER.
          
          But back to reality. 
          Is it really possible to celebrate a happy Easter in the midst of all 
          these social turmoil and political mess? At times we begin to wonder 
          if it remains reasonable to be optimistic about this country. The fact 
          is that many of us have become cynical, refusing to believe that 
          change can still take place, refusing to hold that a better life is 
          still possible. In fact, some people have long given up – they chose 
          to look for greener pasture elsewhere. Can the citizens of a morally 
          shaken country such as ours capable of genuinely greeting each other 
          with greetings of “Alleluias” and “Rejoice, for Christ is risen”?
          
          The answer is why not? 
          After all the Church sincerely believes that the answer to our sad 
          plight goes beyond socio-economic analysis and political maneuverings. 
          For the start our Church believes that this deep Easter experience of 
          the risen Christ would give us the stubborn hope that blossoms best in 
          moments of darkness and ambiguity; that it would give us the needed 
          courage to pick up again the communal problem of searching for the 
          truth that we have temporarily left off; that we can readily face up 
          to the moral problems, political ambiguities, and social illusions, 
          that have through these years tightly gripped the soul of our country. 
          The experience of Easter could give us the hope to extricate ourselves 
          from the sad situation that we are in, the time when work is scarce, 
          when families are so poor they can no longer live with dignity and 
          little pride, when the greed of those in the corridors of power has 
          drowned away all their shame and decency, when corruption has become 
          “our greatest shame as a people” (CBCP, “Reform Yourselves and Believe 
          in the Gospel”).
          
          This hope is dynamic, 
          alive, vigorous. It pushes us to action. It is alien for people of 
          hope to say that the event of our times is inevitable. A Filipino 
          Christian, whose spirit is soaked with the Easter experience, plunges 
          himself into action, for he knows that at the heart of this 
          topsy-turvy nation of ours rests the love of God. Easter has taught 
          him that God has overcome the world. As Jesus said: “In the world you 
          face persecution. But take courage; I have conquered the world” (Jn 
          16:33).
          
          By action here is 
          meant concrete involvement in the unfolding of our history.
          
          Christians who possess 
          the seed of hope in their hearts cannot be passive or indifferent 
          bystanders in the drama which we call “everyday life”. “We can open 
          ourselves and the world and allow God to enter: we can open ourselves 
          to truth, to love, to what is good” (Benedict XVI, Spe Salvi, 35). 
          “Even when we are fully aware that Heaven far exceeds what we can 
          merit”, the Pope says, “it will always be true that our behavior is 
          not indifferent before God and therefore is not indifferent for the 
          unfolding of history” (35). Even when we seem powerless before the 
          enemy, “our actions engender hope for us and for others…” (35). In 
          other words, the more we engage actively and constructively in the 
          efforts to improve society, the more we make alive the hope that is in 
          us. Conversely, the more indifferent we are, the more cynicism 
          destroys our capacity to dream for a better, renewed life.
          
          And when we act, when 
          we actively involve ourselves in the unfolding of history, the element 
          of suffering becomes all the more unavoidable. Being a consequence of 
          our finitude, suffering is already inevitable, but it can swell into 
          horrifying levels when we labor for truth and justice. We can perhaps 
          minimize it by leading a life of utter indifference. We can close our 
          eyes from falsehood and tyranny, and spare ourselves from hostility.
          
          But is this the 
          Christian option? The Holy Father says, “It is not by sidestepping or 
          fleeing from suffering that we are healed, but rather by our capacity 
          for accepting it, maturing through it and finding meaning through 
          union with Christ, who suffered with infinite love” (37). And with a 
          rather stunning emphasis, he repeats at least three (3) times in the 
          encyclical that the capacity to suffer for truth and justice is an 
          essential criterion, the very measure, of humanity (cf. 38 and 39). To 
          abandon this capacity would destroy man himself. “Truth and justice 
          must stand above my comfort and physical well-being, or else my life 
          itself becomes a lie” (38).
          
          HAPPY EASTER! ---
          
          
          That’s the full text 
          of the bishop’s article.
          
          
          * * * * * * * * * *
          
          
          Born in Ormoc City, 
          Leyte on November 6, 1938, bishop Medroso was ordained priest on March 
          30, 1963 with Palo, Leyte as his first assignment.  At age 48 years 
          and 1 month on 
          December 18, 1986, he was appointed bishop of Borongan, 
          Eastern Samar although 
          his ordination as bishop thereat would come four months later, on 
          March 17, 1987.  On October 17, 2006, he was appointed bishop of 
          Tagbilaran, and on December 14 of the same year, he was installed as 
          such church authority in that city of Bohol, an island province in the 
          center of the Philippine archipelago.  A priest for 46.9946.9 years 
          and bishop for 23.0322.9 years as of the last entry on a website that 
          features him, he is very much a pride of the Yuzon and Medroso 
          families in Ormoc, in 
          Leyte and around the 
          Philippines where he 
          has been of service to the Filipino community, for the glory and 
          kingdom of God.
          
          The bishop from Ormoc, 
          a few days after the death of President Corazon Cojuangco Aquino, had 
          commented that Cory deserves to be canonized as a saint.  His comment 
          was featured on a national television.
          
          Ah, yes, some had 
          asked why my own family “became” close to the good bishop, as noticed 
          when he solemnized the wedding of my elder son, Engr. Pacifico Niño 
          Medroso Dela Torre, to Mercury Drug-Rizal Avenue branch (Tacloban) 
          pharmacist Gay Casimero Oliva on 
          September 20, 2003.  The bishop is the first cousin of my wife, Cione.  
          He gave his big picture that was taken upon his assumption as Bishop 
          of Borongan to his other first cousin, Alexander Paune Medroso, 
          younger brother of Cione.  That picture had been on display at the 
          home of the mother of Alex until her death on 
          May 27, 2007.  Cione 
          now keeps that color photograph.  The bishop had visited his uncle, 
          retired master sergeant Timoteo Parilla Medroso, Cione’s father, once, 
          when he was then living at Paterno Extension, on part of what many 
          years later on became the RTR or “freedom” plaza in Tacloban.  We used 
          to visit the bishop in Palo when he was yet priest there.  When he 
          became bishop of Borongan, Alex frequently visited him there.  
          (Mercury Drug would remember him for long.  He endorsed the necessity 
          for that corporation to open a drug store in Borongan, years before it 
          became a city.)
          
          
          * * * * * * * * * *
          
          Today, April 4, 
          2010, the Deloria families in Basey will celebrate the Easter Sunday 
          in barrio Roxas (known erstwhile as Shamrock”).  The affair will be 
          marked by the organization of a new Deloria Clan and adoption of 
          programs – such as livelihood and scholarship – for the benefit of its 
          members.  Organizer Jun Deloria Distrajo, formerly a very active and 
          well-traveled band player and singer, will also invite the members, of 
          whom 750 are voters, to join the Deloria reunion at the U.P. in 
          Diliman, Quezon City come May 15, 2010.  Other Delorias who are living 
          abroad and those from other parts of the Philippine Islands will be 
          attending the May 15 reunion.
           
          
           
          
           
          
           
          
          
          An Article by the Asian Human Rights Commission
          
          
          Who were the massacred journalists? - 
          Part 4
          
          
          Daddy's Little Girl
By  
          
          Mayang Reblando
          
          More than anything 
          else, he was my Daddy.
          
          So much goes into that 
          simple statement. My Daddy, Alejandro "Bong" Reblando was my hero, my 
          strength, the best of all my bestfriends. He was my mentor and my 
          protector. He was the angel sent from above. He was indeed the number 
          one man in my life. He is my inspiration
          
          My daddy showed me 
          what life was all about, and he showed me that at a very young age. He 
          explained well to me how life really is. I knew and understood 
          essential basics – because he cared to inform me – while so many of my 
          friends were still just trying to understand what life is really all 
          about. I was daddy's little girl who sat on her daddy's lap and mingle 
          with him as if I am not her daughter but instead his friend. He taught 
          a lot of things that, for sure, will always be my treasures. He guided 
          me in every decision I made and loved me the way I love best. Daddy 
          told me at an early age all about that money too – that everything he 
          gave to me is not simple money, but it is the fruit of all his 
          hardworks.
          
          As I flashback the 
          memories when he was still alive, he never ever left me behind. When I 
          need someone to fetch me late at night after a long program in school 
          he's always there even he already fell asleep in our house.
          
          I remember one night; 
          I'm too much eager to have a facial with him but was never been able 
          because there are a lot of customers waiting. As I sat on the car I 
          was silent, and without saying a word he knew how I felt – sad. 
          Instantaneously he comforted me and heaved a joke, by then I was 
          relieved.
          
          That's the way my 
          daddy was. He was intuitive. He somehow knew what to say and what to 
          do, even in those times when you had not spoken. You could always 
          count on one important thing, although the words were not expansive. 
          They were the right words.
          
          Most of you knew that 
          he is a strong, talkative, friendly, God-fearing, generous, helpful, 
          kind, respectful and reserved. You'd probably be surprised to know 
          that he was also one of the funniest men I've ever met, and that his 
          artistic ability was tremendous. These were not necessarily traits 
          that he displayed to his friends – he came from a time where humor and 
          art were not always the way to survive.
          
          He was born right in 
          this city, where he lived all his life, during the great depression. 
          My grandparents impressed upon him the seriousness of life and of 
          supporting oneself, and finally the importance of providing for the 
          family. There was no time for the finer qualities of life in those 
          early years for Bong Reblando.
          
          Probably due to that 
          early upbringing, "Bong" was an icon to many of you. He was well known 
          in this city for his works and contributions – to his attitude and 
          skills, and by all of you who are here today. The family name is as 
          entrenched in the town as the town is entrenched in the family. My 
          brothers, sister, mother and I went the same church as our father, and 
          we shopped at the same stores as he.
          
          My hero has passed on 
          now, and he leaves my family and me to carry on the family name. We 
          are proud of him, of all that he was, and all that maybe he would have 
          liked to be if times had been different.
          
          We are mostly proud to 
          say this one thing: Of all that he was – He was our great Daddy.
          
          I won't say goodbye to 
          you deh, but instead I'll say "we will see you when we get there."
          
          Congratulations for 
          entering the Kingdom of God and we are all happy knowing you're safe 
          there and having a smile marked on your face.
          
          I love you so much. 
          
          
          + + + + + + + + + +
          
          
          How Will I Forgive?
By Mayang Reblando
          
          Everyone tells me that I need to forgive.
          
          That all the pain in me must go.
          
          That I need to be free and just live.
          
          But no one knows the memories hold.
          
           
          
          I was hurt throughout my years.
          
          I was put down day to day.
          
          I hold back all of my tears.
          
          And hope that they soon will fade away.
          
           
          
          It's hard to forgive a person who killed.
          
          A person who took away a very precious life,
          
          But the truth that lies within him won't be revealed.
          
          So right now all things cause me strife.
          
           
          
          I won't forgive the man that killed.
          
          For I have never felt this way.
          
          Until my father's life was taken away,
          
          And his life couldn't go on any further.
          
           
          
          My father was young and in love,
          
          And he had a future for me.
          
          I was his special gift sent from above,
          
          But the life I live he won't be able to see.
          
           
          
          Till this day I am unable to forget.
          
          The day that causes me so much sorrow,
          
          But the only thing I do regret,
          
          Is when I wake up without you tomorrow.
          
          
          (About the author: Mayang Reblando is the daughter of 
          Alejandro "Bong" Reblando, one of the 32 journalists who were killed 
          in the Maguindanao Massacre. Her article "Daddy's Little Girl" was 
          written and read by her during Bong's burial in 
          December 5, 2009. Her 
          poem "How will I Forgive" written in January 15, 2010 was also a 
          tribute to her father. The author has given permission to the AHRC in 
          publishing them)