Pinoy in Rome: At
the Door of the Jubilee Year of Mercy (IV)
By ROBERT Z. CORTES
January 20, 2016
Day 5: Mother of Sorrows in
San Carlo aiCatinari
At around this time of year,
there is one scene in the Roman sky that never fails to impress
tourists. It is those huge swarms of black starlings that move around
the city and form very graceful formations in the sky. If one didn't
know what else these huge, graceful clouds of birds were capable of,
he or she would then immediately take out his or her camera and then,
perhaps with mouth agape, would video the magnificent flight
exhibition in the sky.
Of course, the experienced
Roman would know how dangerous that position is. In fact, not only
would they not keep their mouths closed, they would even take an
umbrella when walking under these swarms - and especially when these
birds land on the plane trees which can be found all over the city.
For it is then when one realizes the stinking truth: these graceful
birds actually unload so much excrement on the unsuspecting passerby.
I tell this detail not only
because this is an important warning for future tourists here in Rome.
This detail is actually significant to my story on the fifth day of my
novena to the Immaculate Conception. For as I approached the
not-so--but-should-be-famous church of San Carlo aiCatinari, and heard
from a distance the cacophony of starling sounds and began smelling
the stench, both of which became unbearable as I got nearer the plane
trees that fronted the church, I knew better than to stand there for a
second more. I positively felt the need to enter the church as fast as
I could.
The moment I closed the door
behind me, I immediately felt the relief both of body and soul. I
could still hear the unrelenting noise from outside, but it was
greatly reduced and I felt quite safe inside the church. It may sound
funny, but really, at the time, it came to my mind that the church was
my salvation. It literally saved me from birdshit by providing a roof
over my head and walls to protect my nose and ears. And what roof and
walls: a richly gilded ceiling that only the baroque can offer and
walls holding such beautifully adorned chapels.
The main altar holds a
painting by Borromini's and Bernini's contemporary and peer in talent,
Pietro da Cortona. It shows St. Charles Borromeo carrying one of the
nails that bore our Lord on the Cross. Both the painting and the altar
that holds it are breathtaking. But what was more breathtaking for me
was the image of Our Lady to the right of the main chapel, the image
of Our Lady, Mother of Divine Providence.
The entrance to the chapel
shows the baroque in its magnificence - angels and drapes and all.
Charming as well were the little pillows that bore the names of
children born through the intercession of Our Lady: pink for girls,
blue for boys. It was uplifting to see that Italy, which has the
lowest birthrate in Europe, is still producing babies as late as 2015.
Our Lady's image, of course, is the most charming of all. It is said
that St. John Paul II was so fascinated by the beauty of the image
that after praying, he exclaimed, "I would like to entrust Rome and
myself to this Madonna so beautiful and remarkable..."
I couldn't agree less with
that. But in this visit, what impressed me the most was not, in fact,
this image, which I could only see from a bit of distance. I was
struck more by the Madonna Addolorata (Our Lady of Sorrows) that
greeted me right at the entrance. There were no railings to separate
me from the image and so I could come very close – even touch the feet
through a hole in the glass. I stared at the face filled with so much
anguish and sorrow – and I couldn't help but kneel. Then I realized it
was a Friday, the day for the sorrowful mysteries. Talk about the
guidance of Providence.
So before that inspiring
image I prayed for everyone I could remember in that Rosary – even the
Pinoy OFW sitting on the bench some meters behind me. He had given me
a startled and anguished look as I entered the church. I think I
understood his feeling of solitariness and was sorry I couldn't be of
any greater help, except to pray. But I was praying to Our Lady who
knew what it was to suffer – so I'm sure he would be better somehow.
I knew I was. When I went
out of the church, the starlings were still as cacophonous as ever and
the stench of their dung so foul. But I took time to look back at the
magnificent facade to appreciate the work done by Giovanni Battista Soria (who of course reminded me of Fr. Gary Edgar Fajardo Soria).
What happened to my disgust of starling? Well, it was still there, But
having been reminded about how much Our Lady had suffered, what's a
little birdshit in this life to stop me from admiring the beauty of
God's wonders?
Day 6: The Presentation of
Mary in Santa Maria in Monticelli
Seeing that my schedule was
going to be full in the afternoon, I decided to do my church visit for
the sixth day of the novena to the Immaculate Conception in the
morning. As well, aware that it was Saturday, I wanted to visit a
church dedicated to Our Lady. There are several of these around where
I live and I chose one which I just serendipitously discovered some
days back, when I decided to make a random turn on my way home.
The relatively small church
is called Santa Maria in Monticelli. It's a very old church, having
been consecrated in the early 1100's, such that no one even knows
where the name comes from. It has since then undergone a lot of
restoration and the only thing left of the 12th century construction
is the bell-tower. Nevertheless, most of the church that one presently
sees is still quite old, having been done in the 1700s and so follows
the baroque style.
I walked peacefully for some
5-7 minutes from my house to the church. The sky was blue and the
morning was peaceful. There was nothing like the noise I referred to
in my Friday visit. When I entered the church it was even more
impressively quiet. I thought I was alone until I realized there was a
man sitting in the very dark side altar where the tabernacle was. But
he pretty soon left and so then, in fact, I had the whole church to
myself.
The image of Our Lady on the
main altar is the Presentation of the Virgin. This painting is pretty
modern, having been painted only in the 1900s, but it blends pretty
well with the baroque pillars and older frescoes flanking it,
including the 12th century mosaic of Christ's face above it. It showed
Our Lady so innocent and pure. It was a perfect time and place to be
saying the Rosary on that Saturday morning. In between Hail Mary's, I
would look up and see frescoed on the ceiling the famous women of the
Old Testament. I'd look to my right and left and see the Flagellation
here and the image of Mary, Help of Christians there.
Was that contemplation or
distraction? Probably doesn’t matter. For then, I was reminded that
amidst all the things we call trials in this life, there are many
things both in this life and in the next that we can thank God for. As
well, the quiet and peace in that church that morning helped me to
pray for those who don't have it in these moments - both physically
and spiritually. If these were, in fact, distractions I entertained in
prayer inside this randomly found church, I hope nevertheless they can
still help me prepare for the Jubilee Year of Mercy.
I guess Mary, who “keeps
these things in her heart," and so not that easily distracted, will
make sure of that.
[Robert Z.
Cortes is a Ph.D. student in Social Institutional Communication at the
Pontifical University of Santa Croce, Rome. He has an M.A. in
Education Leadership from Columbia University, N.Y.]
Choosing the right
leaders
By Fr.
ROY CIMAGALA,
roycimagala@gmail.com
January 5, 2016
NOW that we will be going
through another political exercise of choosing our political leaders,
we first of all have to go to God, praying and begging that we be
enlightened and that the whole process be peaceful, beneficial and
fruitful to all of us. This national event is no joke. We have to try
to be dead serious about it.
Of course, we have to
reassure ourselves that since there are no perfect candidates, no
perfect electorate, and the whole exercise, in spite of being designed
to be effective, honest and fair, will always have some loopholes when
put into practice, God can always make do with anything, even the
worst scenario, and can derive some good from evil. There’s always a
fallback somewhere somehow.
That’s why we are still
afloat in spite of all kinds of crises through the years. We should
never forget that God is in the middle of this very contentious
national exercise, and in his own ways is intervening in it actively.
Let’s hope that we can have the faith to see God’s hand in our
political life. We need to remind ourselves that there’s nothing in
our life where God is not concerned and involved somehow.
Just the same, that sobering
fact does not exempt us from choosing the right leaders as best as we
can. That’s why we, at least, have to know what would make a good
leader. We have to know what criteria to use and how these criteria
should be ranked according to importance and indispensability.
Of course, we can have many
ideas about this, but I would say that the most important quality of a
leader is that he should be a man of God, a man after the heart of
God. After all, everything good here on earth, including leadership,
has God as its source, pattern and power.
When a leader is truly a man
of God and not just faking it, he will also have the political welfare
of the people in his heart. He will be concerned of both the temporal
common good of the people as well as the more important eternal common
good. We should try to avoid making these two levels of common good
conflict with each other.
A true leader will strive to
be honest and competent in his job, always dialoguing with the people
to monitor their needs and lead them according to his vision of good
governance.
He understands perfectly
well that his work is an organic extension of God’s providence insofar
as the political needs of the people are concerned. And so he does not
depend only on what is practical and convenient for the people. He
will try his best that God’s laws for us be given priority and be made
to inspire all the policies he will pursue.
Christian believers should
be actively involved in the political life of the country. Of course,
the laity are the ones directly involved in politics, since politics
will always be partisan in character. The clergy can only play the
inspiring role and should be above partisan lines.
Thus, Christian believers
who also are citizens and therefore part of the electorate should know
how to choose their leaders well. They have to learn how to discern
the true and the false leaders, how to weigh the platforms, views and
words of the candidates.
Let’s remember what Christ
said of false prophets. “Beware of false prophets,” he said, “who come
to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravening wolves.” (Mt
7,15) They can show great signs and wonders, and as St. Paul said,
“they deceive the hearts of the simple by their good words and fair
speeches.” (Rom 16,18)
Nowadays, many politicians
have mastered the art of rhetoric and of persuasive speech, and they
can avail of tremendous political and publicity machineries to make
them attractive to the electorate.
It would be good that each
one considers his political choices in his prayer, in front of God,
and closely listening to his conscience. Of course, he has to listen
to all parties involved, but he has to learn how to discern the spirit
of each candidate, the signs of the times, etc.
Since there will always some
risks to be taken in these exercises, one should try his best to
choose candidates that he thinks would serve best for the common good.
He should try to rein in his emotions and passions, and try his best
to be as objective as possible. For this, he may have to consult
others.
Pinoy in Rome: At
the Door of the Jubilee Year of Mercy (III)
By ROBERT Z. CORTES
December 24, 2015
Day 4: Santa Maria della Strada in the Church of Il Gesù
As one might already have suspected, considering that the 4th day of
the novena to the Immaculate Conception falls on the feast of St.
Francis Xavier (one of my favorite saints for reasons you will
probably discern soon) and the patron saint of a bishop very close to
me, I made it a point to go to the Church of Il Gesù to say the Rosary
and do my prayer before his relic.
I knew from experience that the Gesù is often dark. I had always
thought it a pity to be in such a magnificent church, yet unable to
appreciate such beauty. I was hoping against hope that there might be
a bit more light when I went, but it was even darker than I
remembered. And to my shock, there was actually a Mass in the side
chapel of St. Francis, and I could hardly hear the priest talking.
"What? Is this how they value this saint, second in only to their
Founder in importance?" I must confess I had those scandalized
thoughts as I next-to-groped my way through the dimly lit nave,
looking for the chapel of the Madonna.
I was pleasantly surprised to see that the side chapel to the right of
the sanctuary had more light than the rest of the Church – it was the
Chapel of Our Lady. But I was even more pleased to see that the image
venerated there was the "Santa Maria dellaStrada" - a very familiar
appellation to me, even if I'm not from The Ateneo, because my friends
from that area had introduced me to the image. There were also very
nice paintings (new, I think) around the small chapel depicting scenes
of Our Lady's life. There was two seminarians(an African and a South
American) trying to translate the Latin verses written under each
painting. From the agonized looks on their faces and the desperate
hand gestures of the African, I could see they didn't have much luck.
I was tempted to help them out but I had to focus on the Rosary.
Now as I was about to finish my Rosary, something remarkable happened.
The entire Church was suddenly lit up. It was fully lit up and there,
for the first time I saw the full glory of Il Gesù. O-M-G - for it
would be taking the Lord's name in vain if I spelled that out in full;
yet really, that was all I could say. I had hoped Il Gesùnow would be
somehow brighter than my previous times there - but not this bright.
Really, as many persons can attest, God doesn't do things by halves.
So for the first time, I saw how richly decorated was the statue of
St. Ignatius. He is brocaded in jewels and venerated in an altar of
rich lapiz lazuli and green marble. And while Pope Francis might be
living very poorly, as did St. Ignatius, I don't think he'd object to
this depiction of heavenly glory of his spiritual father and one of
the Church's greatest saints.
Then there was the dome and the ceiling. When I spoke previously about
Sant'Agnese's dome as the most magnificent yet I had seen, that was
because I had not seen Il Gesù lit this way. And while I'm not about
to take my wordsback, I must confess that Sant'Agnese's cupola now has
a real contender. I also loved the main altar which showed the Holy
Family.
But I now turn to the real object of my small pilgrimage, who is St.
Francis Xavier. Il Gesù is not as fortunate as India which has the
saint's incorrupt body.But it does have his arm, and I couldn't
believe my fortune for having gone that close to see the
"incorruption" for myself. But to explain that fortune I must go back
to that Mass at the side chapel. That was actually a Spanish mass and
was attended by some Basques, the people of St. Francis's region in
Spain. Afterwards, they had their picture taken and seeing that one
priest couldn't be in the picture since he had to take the picture, I
told him in Spanish that I was willing to do it. My four semesters of
Spanish in college is still quite useful.
So as a "prize" for my voluntary camera work, I was allowed to step
right upto the relic. I was peacefully gazing at the arm when I heard
some sort of sighing beside me: "Oh, the arm that blessed my people!"
He was an Indian priest and was referring to the fact that this arm
had baptized 300,000 Indians. I was friendly, of course, and asked if
he was from Goa, where the saint's body now is, but no, he was from
Kerala or some other place with a K. Anyway, I asked him to take this
picture of me gazing at the relic, and he said, "K!" I wondered if had
been texting with Filipinos, but I wasn't flippant enough to ask.
I spent the rest of the time praying before the relic and thinking
about the saint's zeal for souls. I read that he had died when only 46
from exhaustion of all the apostolate he was happily doing. When I was
done, I walked the vast expanse of the brightly lit Church still
thinking and praying to get even a small part of this saint's zeal. As
I reached the door, it opened and in came the reason for all the
light: two cardinals - an Asian and an African - were about to
celebrate a high mass on the great saint's feast day. On seeing that,
I was secretly relieved that people here valued St. Francis after all
– though I say that now in jest. The African cardinal looked at me and
being no expert, I wasn't sure what to do. I simply nodded and smiled
and he made a sign of blessing.
I was definitely pleased the cardinal did that, but now that I think
of it I realize that his gesture was just a sign. It was a gesture
that ought to remind me of all the wonderful things I had just
experienced in that church. It was also a reminder of the gesture that
had made St. Francis Xavier great - a reminder that I (and you) need
to pass on all the blessings we receive to everyone we know if we want
to be anywhere the glory of St. Francis Xavier and Our Lady, Santa
Maria dellaStrada! Here's praying that they intercede for us to at
least make the first step.
[Robert Z.
Cortes is a Ph.D. student in Social Institutional Communication at the
Pontifical University of Santa Croce, Rome. He has an M.A. in
Education Leadership from Columbia University, N.Y.]
The “no-perfect”
excuse
By Fr.
ROY CIMAGALA,
roycimagala@gmail.com
December 22, 2015
ALL of a sudden, we are
nowadays hearing a lot of people invoking the “no-perfect” alibi to
rationalize their views. There’s no perfect father, no perfect mother,
no perfect child, no perfect family, no perfect etcetera.
And now that we are getting
into the usually hot political season, we are also hearing such
excuses as no perfect politician, no perfect candidate. And from
there, people pontificate or dogmatize their political preferences and
opinions.
While that excuse has a
certain validity, we have to remember that it comes with a lot of
other things that need also to be considered seriously, like
instructions, contraindications, alternative options, and many other
opinions.
While it’s true that we have
to make do with whatever we have or whatever is available, that is, a
wonderful call for patience and understanding, it does not mean that
we won’t make the effort to look for better options or some
improvement of the situation.
In other words, that excuse
should not be made to stop in itself, making one fully contented with
a certain status quo. It has to contend with what are the views of
others, let alone, the standard and criteria of what is considered as
the ideal. We need to keep on trying to polish our understanding of
things and improve on our performance.
What can worsen this
“no-perfect” excuse is when people use it to dogmatize their positions
and demonize those of the others who disagree with them. Sad to say,
this is what is happening these days in the political scene.
We hear reasonings like
“better a killer than a criminal,” “better a curser than a robber,”
etc. At the very least, these reasonings make the gravity of the
different evils subject only to the opinions and consensus of people,
a product of the I’m-ok-you’re-ok mentality. There’s no more objective
basis.
Murder can have equal weight
as stealing, or can even be considered as the lesser evil, when in
fact the former does not admit of parvity of matter, (meaning it is
always grave), while the latter does, (meaning it may or may not be
grave).
I know that in heated
political discussions where passions run high and a lot of bashings
and mudslingings are done, considerations like this get lost. But it’s
important that we give due attention to these important points,
otherwise we will be setting ourselves for a graver problem and crisis
later on.
Knowing how political
systems work, what is usually done at the top, whether right or wrong,
moral or immoral, somehow filters down to the lower rungs until it
becomes part of the system. If the leader is honest, most likely, the
followers will also be honest. If the leader is a murderer and flaunts
it, most likely the followers will also be the same.
Thus, we have to consider
whether murders and illegal executions of perceived wrongdoers that
become part of our system are a lesser evil compared to some
systematized corruption. Of course, we have bad options to choose
from, but just the same we have to be careful that we don’t jump from
the frying pan into the fire.
This is where we have to use
the “no-perfect” excuse prudently. We cannot help but to make do with
some forms of evil. But we have to make sure which evil is lesser and
more tolerable. And in an unavoidable evil, we also have to make sure
that our cooperation in it would at least be passive, not active, and
with firm intention to correct it.
We have to distinguish
between what is already a formal and active cooperation of an evil,
which means that one knowingly and freely participates in the evil,
and what is mere material and passive toleration of evil, since he
cannot avoid it, at least, for the moment.
Formal cooperation is always
sinful and should be avoided. Material cooperation may be tolerated,
but under certain conditions and precautions. Among these conditions
are:
(1) The cooperating act must
be, in itself, good or at least indifferent morally. (2) The intention
of the one cooperating should be good. (3) There must be a just cause.
(4) And the good effect desired in that cooperation should not be the
consequence of the bad effect.
To be realistic with the way
our political life is, we need to be clear and firm with these moral
principles. For this, we need to intensify our prayers, have recourse
to the sacraments, deepen our doctrinal formation and develop virtues.
We should always try, in
whatever way we can, to transform evil into good.
Second part of a series
|
Sant'Agnese
- view from South piazza Navona |
Pinoy in Rome:
Countdown to the Jubilee Year of Mercy (II)
By
ROBERT Z. CORTES
December 12, 2015
Day 3: Sant’Agnese in Agone
One knows he’s getting
"spoiled" by Rome's beauty when he avoids Piazza Navona at all costs
when he makes the seven-minute walk from Piazza Farnese (the area
where I live) to Piazza Sant'Apollinare (where my university is). One
would understand the logic of that, of course, especially in this
season when this place is just so full of people at around lunch time.
But there is a beautiful
church there, alas, too often missed out by the usual tourist, who is
naturally fascinated by the Bernini fountain of the Quattro Fiumi
(though less so by the ones of Giacomo della Porta on both ends of the
piazza) and awed by the sheer activity in the piazza (live music,
painters, living statues, pigeons, etc.). Once one’s attention are
caught by these distractions, one loses track of time in the piazza
and realizes only too late that there’s no more time to enter the
church. It doesn't help that unlike the bigger churches in Rome, the
people manning this church demand their siesta time.
By some act of providence –
most probably acting through human error – my choir’s practice ended
so late yesterday. By the time I had finished eating lunch, I looked
at my watch and realized it was one of those “oh-happy-fault” moments:
it was opening time for Sant'Agnese in Agone. It was then settled that
I was going to do the third day of my novena to the Immaculate
Conception there.
This Baroque church is as
baroque as baroque can get, just judging from the facade made by
Francesco Borromini. As one approaches the church from the southern
end, however, one should turn his back a bit, so one sees an image of
Our Lady known (one of those altar-like structures called Madonella in
Italy). Now this is one would be one of the most charming Rome can
offer. For it has a beautiful cornice over the image with the
inscription "Advocata Nostra" and "ora pro nobis." The image is large
as well, and was obviously placed there to "Christianize" the whole
formerly pagan stadium, saying "Our advocate, pray for us!"
As one enters the Church, if
one still had any doubts that this is the height of baroque, one look
at the arresting ceiling and dome will settle that. I would have to
say that of the many domes I have seen in Rome, this would be the most
impressive. But all the pictures I’ve don’t justice to it. For that I
had to turn to Aaron Articulo, one of the Philippines’ most promising
young photographers, who has graciously lent me this picture to share
with you. (You can get in touch with him in Facebook and introduce
yourself as a reader of this column; he just may pass on to you a copy
of his masterful photo.)
In any case, all the
sculptures and reliefs in this church all shout "baroque!" You can see
that fact on the relief of the main altar, before which I did my
rosary. It's a relief of the "double Holy Family" (of Jesus and St.
John the Baptist). To add to the baroque-ness, baroque music was
playing. It's not very easy to pray with that, however – at least for
me. So when it was about time to do mental prayer, I decided to enter
a small chapel where I knew a treasure is kept.
That treasure is the skull
of St. Agnes, which one sees enshrined in a beautiful metal sculpture
ordered made by St. Pius X. I was very lucky, because for a long time
I was alone with the holy relic. In between short bits when some old
people were coming in and out, I got to focus more on the physical and
spiritual reality of the relic before me. The last time I was here, I
was fascinated by how the skull was so small. Now, I realized it was
only the upper part, that is, from the upper jaw to the top of the
cranium. But aside from that, she was also just twelve years old. Some
paintings show her already as a robust woman whose neck could give
even the sharpest metal a hard time. That gross oversight is not only
unhistorical, but also takes away from the impressiveness of her
martyrdom. I was mulling on these ideas as I ended my prayer, totally
awed by this privileged moment.
Before I end this article,
however, maybe just a word about the phrase, "in agone" that forms
part of the church’s name. Many people think it's from the word
"agony" which would then refer to St. Agnes's martyrdom. Tempting as
that may be, however, it’s not the case. In fact the word "agone" is a
Latin word derived from the Greek which means "competition" - because
Piazza Navona before was the area of the Stadium of Diocletian where
there used to be a lot of... well, you guessed it.
But, then, of course, it so
happens that the English word “agony” does come from agone for all the
anguish and suffering that happens in the stadium. And Saint Agnes
suffered the agony of her martyrdom in the "circus agonalis" of this
emperor during what is considered the cruelest persecution of
Christians in the Roman Empire. So there is a cosmic coincidence in
the name of the church: the place of competition and of anguish. For
Saint Agnes, there was not only competition and anguish; more
importantly, there was victory.
This final perseverance in
grace, despite all our difficulties, is the one thing we need to pray
for ourselves, and the one thing we pray St. Agnes and Our Lady will
obtain for us.
[Robert Z.
Cortes is a Ph.D. student in Social Institutional Communication at the
Pontifical University of Santa Croce, Rome. He has an M.A. in
Education Leadership from Columbia University, N.Y.]