A safer 
			registration process
			By 
			NAMFREL
			August 18, 2020
			The National Citizens' 
			Movement for Free Elections (NAMFREL) welcomes the decision of the 
			Commission on Elections (COMELEC) to resume the registration of 
			voters for the 2022 elections on September 1 nationwide, except in 
			areas under Enhanced Community Quarantine (ECQ) or Modified ECQ. 
			NAMFREL also commends the COMELEC for taking steps to implement 
			anti-COVID precautions, like preventing symptomatic applicants from 
			entering Comelec premises, ensuring physical distancing, requiring 
			applicants to wear face masks and face shields, and encouraging 
			applicants to bring their own pens.
			In a press release on 
			August 15, the Comelec said that they are "encouraging applicants to 
			download the application forms from www.comelec.gov.ph," and 
			"strongly recommended that downloaded forms be filled out before 
			going to the COMELEC office for registration." NAMFREL believes that 
			the COMELEC could improve the upcoming registration process by 
			implementing elements of their previous iRehistro system, previously 
			offered to OFWs, and expanding them nationwide.
			Online submission of 
			requirements
			NAMFREL believes that 
			Comelec could take the anti-COVID precautions further by making it a 
			requirement to download and accomplish the forms, and for the 
			applicants to bring their own writing materials, instead of being 
			merely recommendations. The Comelec could also take the precautions 
			even further, by exploring the possibility of digitally transforming 
			the registration process, by allowing a voter registrant, using any 
			electronic device like a laptop, tablet, or smartphone, to fill out 
			a registration form online and submit the same electronically to the 
			Comelec.
			Appointment system
			To further prevent the 
			crowding of people at Comelec offices, NAMFREL further urges the 
			COMELEC to implement an online appointment system during the 
			submission of requirements. As has been observed in previous 
			registration activities at the Comelec offices or even in satellite 
			registration locations, the Comelec can only accept a finite number 
			of applications a day. An appointment system will help ensure that 
			registrants would come to their respective Comelec offices only on 
			the appointed day and time that they can be served. An online 
			appointment system would not be new to Filipinos, as this is the 
			kind of system being used in securing appointments for processing of 
			passports and NBI clearances, among others.
			NAMFREL is currently 
			drafting a set of further recommendations for lawmakers and election 
			administrators to help ensure that Filipinos are amply protected 
			every step of the way as the country enters another election cycle.
			The upcoming resumption of 
			the registration of voters will be an important indicator of how the 
			Comelec would handle the holding of the 2022 elections amidst a 
			pandemic. NAMFREL remains hopeful that starting with the 
			registration, the Comelec would adopt processes that are efficient, 
			cost effective, and have the utmost safety of Filipinos in mind, to 
			invite confidence from the public and from polling staff that they 
			would not be exposed to infection if they go out to vote or do their 
			poll duties in 2022.
 
 
 
 
			The urgent duty 
			to evangelize politics
			
			
By Fr. 
			ROY CIMAGALA, 
			roycimagala@gmail.com
			August 17, 2020
			CONTRARY to the view that 
			clerics should be completely hands-off and quiet about politics, we 
			need to realize more deeply that clerics, in fact, have the grave 
			duty to evangelize politics just as they ought to do the same in all 
			the other temporal affairs of men and women, like in business, the 
			arts, sciences and technology, sports and recreation, even in 
			fashion, etc.
			They have to bring the 
			spirit of Christ to bear on all these human concerns, because that 
			spirit should be involved in everything that is human. In fact, it 
			has to be made known that that spirit is supposed to be what is 
			proper to animate all these human affairs.
			I think that it would be 
			wrong to think that evangelization should just remain in the level 
			of the spiritual and the supernatural, or in the level of the 
			theoretical. Clerics should have a working knowledge of how things 
			go in these fields of human endeavor. Their evangelization should 
			lead and cause some practical and concrete transformation in people 
			and in the way they do politics and carry out their earthly 
			responsibilities.
			Except that extreme care 
			has to be done so that this duty of evangelization is not turned 
			into playing partisan politics. This, of course, is not easy to do 
			since things can be confusing and we are always in the constant 
			process of knowing things better. So, a lot of prudence and patience 
			are always needed and a keen desire to clarify and help others 
			should be kept and developed.
			And when we, the clerics, 
			happen to commit mistakes in this area, as when we overstep our 
			authority, we should be humble and simple enough to acknowledge 
			those mistakes and do the necessary corrections.
			What is meant by 
			evangelizing politics is that aside from proclaiming what is 
			absolutely moral and immoral, it should foster an environment of 
			frank and cordial dialogue among the different and even conflicting 
			parties involved, keen desire with matching effort to pursue the 
			common good, adherence to agreed rules of engagement as articulated 
			in our legal and judicial systems, etc.
			Of course, our human 
			systems can never be absolutely perfect. They will always be a work 
			in progress, always in need of updating, adapting, polishing, 
			refining. We should learn how to live with that condition, and how 
			to make the necessary improvements in them as we go along.
			Let’s always remember that 
			we are not expected to agree on everything. And part of evangelizing 
			politics should be that we learn how to disagree without 
			compromising charity and unity among ourselves.
			It’s important that the 
			channels of dialogue should always be open no matter how different 
			and conflicting our views are. Thus, it is very advisable to be 
			always friendly and in talking terms with everyone, no matter how in 
			conflict our views are.
			We should avoid rash 
			judgments, reckless and inflammatory words, or any antagonistic 
			action and gestures that can suggest and, worse, agitate people to 
			have a recourse to violence, or an invitation to hatred, etc.
			Also, putting labels or 
			branding people as liberal or conservative, progressive or 
			regressive, or fanatically sticking to party and ideological lines, 
			while valid up to a certain extent, do not capture the whole dynamic 
			of people’s real thoughts and intentions. We should be wary of 
			habituating ourselves in them. They usually oversimplify things and 
			give rise to unnecessary misunderstandings.
			Everyone has to remember 
			that in matters of opinion, like in many political issues, no one 
			has all the good reasons. It’s important that we listen to each 
			other, since everyone has a reason for his opinions and preferences, 
			then study the issues well, before we make and defend our own 
			positions.
			The moment people do not 
			talk to one another anymore, and, worse, are harboring ill-feelings 
			and antagonistic attitude towards others, that’s when we are 
			creating a toxic environment that is not healthy to our society. We 
			should do everything to avoid this situation.
 
 
 
 
			Mark of a good 
			prayer
			
By 
			Fr. ROY CIMAGALA, 
			roycimagala@gmail.com
			August 12, 2020
			IF we really have a good 
			prayer, one where we truly have an intimate encounter with God, we 
			for sure would come out of it burning with zeal for love and concern 
			for the others. Somehow we would catch the fire behind these words 
			of Christ: “I have come to bring fire on the earth, and how I wish 
			it were already kindled!” (Lk12,49)
			Yes, real prayer has that 
			effect. If, on the contrary, we come out of it just thinking of our 
			own selves, or worse, feeling low and dry, then we are not actually 
			praying. Prayer will always sharpen our mindfulness and 
			thoughtfulness of the others.
			Prayer is by definition an 
			act of love. And love in turn is always self-perpetuating. It never 
			stops giving itself to God. As St. Francis de Sales would put it, 
			“The measure of love is to love without measure.”
			And because of our love 
			for God, then our prayer which is an act of love for God will always 
			lead us to love others. That is always the trajectory of a true, 
			love-inspired prayer. Its vertical aspect never leaves behind the 
			horizontal aspect.
			In his first letter, St. 
			John said regarding this point: “If anyone says, ‘I love God,’ but 
			hates his brother, he is a liar. For anyone who does not love his 
			brother whom he has seen, cannot love God whom he has not seen. And 
			we have this commandment from Him: whoever loves God must love his 
			brother as well.” (4,19-21)
			Of course, it cannot be 
			denied that there are times when in spite of our best intentions and 
			effort, we still would feel dry. Neither should we be surprised by 
			this. Many saints, who really had intimate conversations with God, 
			also experienced the same phenomenon. God allows that to happen for 
			a good purpose. Such dryness serves to purify and deepen our faith 
			and piety.
			But normally, even in the 
			worst scenario when we would be feeling low and dry in our prayer, 
			the heart would still beat for love and concern for the others. 
			Genuine prayer can have no other effect. If in prayer we are truly 
			with God, we should also be with others. It cannot be any other way.
			So in these times of 
			lockdown and quarantine, we have to make sure that our prayer does 
			not begin and end only with our own selves. It has to begin and end 
			with God. And because of God, it somehow has to involve the others.
			We have to be wary of our 
			tendency to convert our prayer as a way to build some kind of an 
			ivory tower, where we isolate ourselves from the others. This can 
			happen when our idea of being with God is detached from being with 
			the others. Sad to say, we can observe some people falling into this 
			trap.
			This can also happen when 
			our idea of prayer is too spiritual as to neglect the material 
			dimension of our life. Let us remember that man is by definition a 
			composite of spirit and matter, of the soul and the body. He cannot 
			be one without the other.
			If our prayer has to lead 
			us to love others, then that love has to be shown by caring not only 
			for the spiritual needs of the others. That love also has to care 
			for their material needs. And vice-versa.
			In the end, what is most 
			important is that everyone is led to God who is the Alpha and Omega 
			of our life and of the whole world. So, our love for the others that 
			comes as a result of our prayer should not just be limited to doing 
			philanthropy or some acts of altruism. Our prayer-inspired love for 
			the others should bring them to love God the way God loves us.
			For as Christ clearly 
			commanded us, we have to love one another as he himself has loved 
			us. (cfr. Jn 13,34)
 
 
 
 
			Protect all 
			humanity by ratifying the nuclear weapon ban treaty
			
			Joint statement of Philippine Red 
			Cross and International Committee of the Red Cross on the 75th 
			anniversary of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki blasts
			August 9, 2020
			On this day 75 years ago, 
			an entirely new type of weapon exploded above the Japanese city of 
			Hiroshima. Within a fraction of a second, a massive dome of fire 
			filled the sky. The intense heat of the explosion eclipsed the 
			center of the coastal city, immediately vaporizing all living 
			things. A millisecond later, a violent supersonic blast wave 
			expanded outwards from the fireball in all directions, levelling 
			most of the city and its 340,000 inhabitants to the ground.
			A few weeks later, Fritz Bilfinger, a delegate of the International 
			Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), arrived in Hiroshima to assess 
			the damage. The telegram he sent back to his colleagues in Tokyo 
			painted a chilling picture: “city wiped out; eighty percent all 
			hospitals destroyed or seriously damaged; inspected two emergency 
			hospitals, conditions beyond description, full stop; effects of bomb 
			mysteriously serious, stop.” 
			
			It would later emerge that the explosion had instantly killed tens 
			of thousands of people and inflicted unspeakable suffering upon many 
			others. Three days after the bombing of Hiroshima, on 9 August 1945, 
			the new weapon would again unleash its terrifying power, this time 
			to kill and injure 60 per cent of the population of Nagasaki, 
			another Japanese city. 
			
			In the following months and years, despite the best efforts of the 
			ICRC and the Japanese Red Cross Society to assist the victims, tens 
			of thousands more would die from the bombs’ long-lasting effects. 
			Disturbingly, the explosion has continued to kill and injure up 
			until this day, each year causing cancers and other deadly illnesses 
			in those who found themselves in its vicinity.
			Throughout history, the international community has taken decisive 
			action to prohibit and eliminate weapons that have unacceptable 
			humanitarian consequences. The unspeakable suffering and devastation 
			witnessed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki led the ICRC and the wider Red 
			Cross and Red Crescent Movement to advocate that nuclear weapons 
			must never be used again and prohibited under international law. The 
			Senate of the Philippines, through the efforts of the undersigned 
			Richard Gordon, adopted Senate Resolution No. 47 in 2017 expressing 
			full support to the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement’s call to 
			ban and eliminate nuclear weapons. 
			
			In 2017, 122 States including the Philippines responded to the 
			evidence of the immense suffering resulting from any use of nuclear 
			weapons by adopting the landmark Treaty on the Prohibition of 
			Nuclear Weapons (TPNW). The TPNW includes a comprehensive set of 
			prohibitions on participating in any nuclear weapons activities, 
			including developing, testing, producing, using or threatening to 
			use them. Three years later, this treaty needs an additional 10 
			ratifications to enter into force. 
			
			But why is such a treaty needed, 75 years after the atomic bombings 
			of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? This is because there are still nearly 
			14,000 nuclear weapons in the world, thousands of which are at 
			“hair-trigger” alert, ready to be launched at a moment’s notice. 
			
			The use of even a fraction of these weapons would cause long-term 
			and irreversible effects on human health, the environment, the 
			climate and food-production – that is, everything that life depends 
			on – threatening future generations and the very survival of 
			humanity. 
			
			Any use of nuclear weapons would generate colossal humanitarian 
			needs that no government or international organization has the 
			capacity to respond to. Who, then, will assist the victims of a 
			nuclear explosion, and how? What we cannot prepare for, we must 
			prevent.
			Last year, the 70th anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, the 
			foundational instruments of international humanitarian law (IHL), 
			provided a forceful reminder that even wars have limits. Military 
			needs can never justify using inhumane or indiscriminate weapons. 
			There is little doubt that adherence to the TPNW will help protect 
			future generations and be a turning point in our efforts to end the 
			era of nuclear weapons. The Philippines can play a leading role in 
			achieving this goal.
			By signing the treaty in 2017, the Philippines became one of the 
			flagbearers for this important convention. In now joining a growing 
			number of states in ratifying the TPNW, the Philippines can increase 
			the chances of the treaty coming into force, thereby honoring the 
			memory of the hundreds of thousands of victims of Hiroshima and 
			Nagasaki.
			Sen. Richard J. Gordon
			Chairman and CEO
			Philippine Red Cross
			Boris Michel
			Head of Delegation
			ICRC Philippines
 
 
 
 
			Knowing and 
			loving Christ
			
			
By 
			Fr. ROY CIMAGALA, 
			roycimagala@gmail.com
			August 5, 2020
			WITH Christ, it is not 
			enough to know him. We also have to love him. With Christ, to know 
			him truly is to love him also. In fact, we cannot say we really know 
			him unless we love him too.
			With him, these two 
			spiritual operations of ours merge into a unity, although they have 
			different directions. In knowing, the object known is in the knower. 
			It has an inward movement. The knower possesses the known object.
			In loving, the lover is in 
			the beloved. It has an outward movement. It is the beloved that 
			possesses the lover. The lover gets identified with the beloved. The 
			lover becomes what he loves.
			In knowing, the knower 
			abstracts things from his object of interest and keeps them to 
			himself. In loving, the lover gives himself to the beloved. In a 
			sense, the lover loses himself in the beloved.
			Of course, there are many 
			things that we know but which we do not have to love, or even that 
			we should not love. We can know a lot of evils, but we should never 
			love them. If anything at all, our knowledge of them is just for the 
			sake of prudence.
			But whatever good we know, 
			we should also love, otherwise we would fall into some anomaly of 
			inconsistency. In whatever is good, we should not be contented with 
			knowing it. We should love it. Let’s remember what St. Paul said in 
			his first letter to the Corinthians in this regard:
			“Knowledge puffs up, but 
			love builds up. If anyone imagines that he knows something, he does 
			not yet know as he ought to know. But if anyone loves God, he is 
			known by God.” (8,1-2)
			And we can add that if one 
			is known by God, he somehow already knows everything that he ought 
			to know since God, who possesses him because he loves God, knows 
			everything. In other words, he shares in the knowledge of God.
			Since Christ is for us the 
			highest good we can have, we should both know and love him to the 
			max. We should not just know him and not love him, nor should we 
			just love him without knowing him – or at least, trying to know him 
			the best way that we can, since being God, Christ has aspects that 
			are a mystery to us, that is, beyond our capacity to know him fully.
			It’s when we love him with 
			all our heart as we are commanded to do (cfr. Mt 22,37) that 
			whatever inadequacy we have with respect to our knowledge of him, is 
			taken care of. If our heart is united we the heart of God, that is, 
			when we are in love with God, we in a mysterious way share in the 
			omniscience of God.
			That is why we can say 
			that those simple people with great love and piety for God has 
			greater knowledge of God than those erudite theologians and 
			philosophers whose love and piety for God is not as great as those 
			of the simple people, in spite of the fact that they may have 
			studied the faith a lot more.
			This does not mean that 
			loving God with the heart more than the head is a matter of 
			indulging in emotionalism and things like that. If one truly loves 
			God with his whole heart, he also will do everything in his human 
			capacity to study his faith well and to conform his life to that 
			faith.
			Loving God never 
			compromises our rational nature that has both the intuitive and 
			discursive capabilities. Loving God uses these capabilities to the 
			hilt but also acknowledges the limitations of these human powers. 
			Loving God, more than anything else, involves the role of grace that 
			God himself unstintingly gives us but to which we have to correspond 
			properly with our acts of piety.
 
 
 
 
			Distancing, yes. 
			Indifference, no
			
			
By Fr.
			ROY CIMAGALA, 
			roycimagala@gmail.com
			July 29, 2020
			BECAUSE of our abnormal 
			times, we are asked to submit ourselves to certain protocols that we 
			usually do not have during normal times. Right now, we are asked, 
			and we should obey, those strict indications about social or 
			physical distancing, wearing of masks, washing of hands, etc.
			In fact, as much as 
			possible, we should just stay at home, avoiding having to go out 
			unless truly necessary, if only to steer clear of the possibility of 
			infecting or being infected by others. Truth is we would not know 
			what would hit us if we go out. Our common enemy is invisible. The 
			person beside us could be the Trojan horse, the traitor. We can 
			easily be a victim of a friendly fire, so to speak.
			But this does not mean 
			that while we follow these protocols as strictly as possible, we 
			have to be indifferent to others, or worse, to regard them as an 
			enemy, considering them as suspects and all of this leading us to a 
			terrible state of paranoia. If anything at all, our relation with 
			others should become more intimate, more caring and compassionate. 
			This ideal can always be pursued together with due prudence.
			This can always be done if 
			we first of all exercise our faith, hope and charity, which are 
			foremost an operation of the heart and mind where no viruses can 
			enter, unless we let them. We just have to see to it that the state 
			of our mind and heart is healthy, that is, deeply rooted on our 
			trust in God’s loving, wise and merciful providence.
			With that condition in 
			place, we would know what to do even if we are forced to some 
			lockdowns in our respective homes and communities. The mind and 
			heart are always creative and inventive. They have resources to 
			resist inactivity and negativity. They will always find things to do 
			instead of just rotting away in idleness which is a very dangerous 
			situation to be in.
			And that’s because our 
			mind and heart have the capacity to bring us to God who takes care 
			of everything. Even in our worst scenario, when things can be 
			unsolvable already, we know what to do to derive what is good for 
			us.
			So, we can say that the 
			condition we are having right now is a good opportunity to develop 
			and strengthen our spiritual and supernatural life through the 
			proper exercise in our mind and heart of the divine gifts of faith, 
			hope and charity.
			Let us seize this moment 
			to attend to this basic need of ours that we actually have been 
			ignoring for quite some time now. If there is one thing very good 
			and worthwhile that we can derive from this crisis we are having 
			today, it could be this one.
			We should realize that we 
			have a golden opportunity to make ourselves stronger in that aspect 
			of our life which is the most important since that is what brings us 
			to our eternal and definitive life. We have a golden opportunity to 
			know the true value of our earthly things and conditions – that they 
			only have a relative value. What is of absolute value is our eternal 
			life that can be reached through faith, hope and charity.
			So, what we seem to lose 
			because of our social or physical distancing, mask wearing, hand 
			washing and the other protocols, we can more than make up with our 
			prayers and sacrifices through the exercise of our faith, hope and 
			charity.
			With the spiritual and 
			supernatural exercises, we can gain greater intimacy with the 
			others, more effective compassion with them, the kind that is not 
			afraid to get dirty with the others as long as the truly essential 
			is not compromised.
			This is where we can 
			validate what St. Paul said, that when we are truly with God, 
			everything will work out for the good. (cfr. Rom 8,28) With God, we 
			can derive good from evil!
 
 
 
 
			Living with 
			unavoidable evil
			
			
By 
			Fr. ROY CIMAGALA,
			roycimagala@gmail.com
			July 17, 2020
			THE parable of the wheat 
			and the weed (cfr. Mt 13,24-30) reminds us that in our life we have 
			to learn how to contend with unavoidable evil even as we do many 
			good things. We are somehow warned not to overreact to evil that 
			would do us more harm than good. We have to learn to be realistic 
			about this condition without, of course, compromising what is truly 
			essential in our life.
			There are times when we 
			simply have to tolerate and suffer the evils around us when in the 
			meantime there is nothing morally right that we can do to turn 
			things around. That is why we are encouraged to develop the virtue 
			of patience.
			Patience teaches us not 
			only how to tolerate evil and bear the ensuing pain, but also to 
			reassure us that every suffering brings a very uplifting, if 
			purifying and saving, value in life. It is a very positive value, 
			very forward-looking, in fact. That is why it is always accompanied 
			by serenity and even joy.
			Patience is also about 
			waiting for the real and ultimate justice of God to unfold. It 
			assures us that evil does not have the last word. It is always the 
			good, though that good may come at a much later date. It tells us 
			that the justice of God, which is always accompanied by charity, 
			never fails. If it does not come now, it will surely come at some 
			other time.
			But there are also times 
			when to tolerate and suffer, or when to wait for a later and more 
			favorable time would not be possible or would be hardly practicable. 
			It’s in these cases when we might be forced to do some cooperation 
			in evil. This where we have to rightly know when that cooperation is 
			legitimate and moral, and when it is not.
			In this regard, it is good 
			that we master the moral doctrine about cooperation in evil. Evil, 
			as we said, is growing around us and has struck deep roots. We have 
			to learn how to deal with it. Obviously, we cannot help but get 
			dirty ourselves, and yet there is also a way to clean up and make 
			up. We just always need to return to God, as often as necessary.
			Cooperating in evil 
			happens when one participates, one way or another, in an immoral 
			action of another person. This can either be formal, that is, when 
			the co-operator approves of it also, or material, that is, when the 
			co-operator simply tolerates the act because he somehow cannot 
			escape from it.
			Formal cooperation is 
			always sinful and should be avoided. Material cooperation may be 
			lawful and thus can be tolerated, but under certain conditions and 
			precautions. Among these conditions are:
			(1.) The cooperating act 
			must be, in itself, good or indifferent morally. (2.) The intention 
			of the one cooperating should be good. (3.) There must be a just 
			cause. (4.) And the good effect desired in that cooperation should 
			not be the consequence of the bad effect.
			Besides, one should avoid 
			causing scandal and creating occasions of sin for the others. And he 
			should be morally strong not to be affected by the evil he is 
			somehow forced to cooperate materially. In a sense, he should be 
			ready to get dirty and to do away with some aspects of life without 
			compromising his spiritual life. Christ told us not to be afraid of 
			anything that can kill the body but cannot kill the soul. (cfr. Mt 
			10,28)
			For this, one has to 
			intensify his life of prayers, recourse to the sacraments, doctrinal 
			formation and development of virtues. He should always try, in 
			whatever way he can, to transform the evil into something good. When 
			truly united with God, he can manage because God can always derive 
			good from evil.
			We really have to learn 
			how to live with unavoidable evil in this world!
 
 
 
 
			Be unitive, not 
			divisive
			
By 
			Fr. ROY CIMAGALA,
			roycimagala@gmail.com
			July 2, 2020
			I DIDN’T realize that a 
			joke video I shared sometime ago on social media would resonate with 
			so many people. It was about a fellow who wondered why a wife rushed 
			to cremate her husband when he only started to have a fever.
			Some people told me that 
			with couples under lockdown, some tension and conflict become 
			unavoidable. “They know that their commitment to each other,” 
			someone told me in jest, “should be ‘till death do us part.’ But it 
			should not be 24/7 that they be together.”
			Indeed, it’s undeniable 
			that seeing each other the whole day, let alone, for an indefinite 
			number of days, can create friction. We are all notorious for that. 
			We seem helpless before that tendency. But it’s a challenge we have 
			to face and learn to handle well. And the current quarantine 
			dispensation is a good occasion to do that. We actually have a 
			golden opportunity in our hands to learn something very precious.
			I was just both amused and 
			disturbed that in the social media these days, some funny conflicts 
			and useless squabbling over unimportant matters are playing out. A 
			young doctor, for example, bashes a public official over a matter of 
			prudence about what proper steps and measures are supposed to be 
			taken regarding our protection from the Covid, triggering a chain of 
			similar reactions. And things like this seem to be sprouting in many 
			places.
			It cannot be denied that 
			all this can be an effect of the unfamiliar and uncomfortable 
			situation brought about by this quarantine thing. People become 
			irritable. Egos get easily rubbed, especially if there’s some public 
			image to protect and project. Patience gets over-stretched and 
			becomes a costly commodity.
			To a third party quite 
			detached from the issues involved, it is clear that everyone has a 
			point, except that the tone and manner of presenting and reacting to 
			things get exaggerated. One overreacts to a view expressed by 
			another person, and the person also overreacts in response. It’s 
			like the Law of Talion being played out, and before you know it you 
			have an explosive situation over something that is really nothing.
			We have to learn to calm 
			down, respecting each other’s opinions. We cannot avoid differences. 
			That’s part of being human. But let’s not forget that at the end of 
			the day we all are in the same boat. We have to care for one 
			another. We float or sink depending on how we behave toward each 
			other.
			When we are sober, keeping 
			our emotions under control, we can actually sort out our differences 
			quite well. And even in those instances when our differences cannot 
			be reconciled, we can always manage to disagree in an agreeable 
			manner.
			Let’s make use of this 
			Covid-caused quarantine lifestyle to learn to be more patient, more 
			understanding and caring towards others. Yes, let’s learn to be more 
			humble, because all this useless quarrels are at bottom a matter of 
			pride and vanity.
			Let’s learn how not to get 
			tired seeing the same faces the whole day. In fact, let’s be 
			accepting of everybody, regardless of how one is, warts and all. 
			Never allow critical thoughts and grudges to stay long in us. On the 
			contrary, let’s be ever creative and inventive in showing our love, 
			concern, affection for everybody, being quick to understand and to 
			forgive.
			When we notice that we 
			want to distance ourselves from someone, then it is a clear sign 
			that we have a problem, and that problem has to be solved with God’s 
			grace and our effort.
			The same attitude should 
			be kept when we are in some public discussion or engagement. We have 
			to be careful with our emotions, and let’s see to it that our 
			humility is kept strong and vibrant especially when we are 
			misunderstood or mistreated.
			Our foremost concern is 
			that we foster unity always, never allowing any signs of 
			divisiveness to creep in, as much as possible!