MANILA, Philippines  
          –  The 118-strong League of Cities of the Philippines (LCP), led by 
          Iloilo City Mayor Jerry P. Treñas and Calbayog City Mayor Mel Senen S. 
          Sarmiento, LCP President and Secretary General, respectively, filed a 
          petition before the Supreme Court on Tuesday (March 27) to declare 
          null and void the cityhood laws of six towns.
          
          The towns which 
          include Baybay, Leyte; Bogo, Cebu; Catbalogan, Samar; Tandag, Agusan 
          del Sur; Borongan, Eastern Samar; and, Tayabas, Quezon were named 
          respondents to the petition for violating Section 10, Article X and 
          Section 1, Article III of the 1987 Constitution. 
          
          LCP has designated 
          Puno and Puno Law Office to file the petition for prohibition in its 
          behalf as well as the request for the issuance of a Temporary 
          Restraining Order (TRO) against the conduct of a plebiscite in the 
          said towns.
          
          Treñas said the towns 
          failed to meet the requirements provided for under the Local 
          Government Code which technically disqualifies them from conversion 
          into cities.
          
          The cityhood bills 
          lapsed into law after the President failed to sign them 30 days after 
          they were submitted to Malacañang.  Despite failing to meet the 
          requirements of Republic Act 9009, these were still passed by 
          Congress. 
          
          Under RA 9009, a town 
          should have a locally generated income of at least P100 million 
          annually before it could be classified into a city.  It should also 
          either have a land area of at least 100 square kilometers or a 
          population of 150,000.
          
          The League argued that 
          the cityhood laws violated Section 10, Article X of the 1987 
          Constitution by unlawful exemption of these towns from complying with 
          the minimum income requirement imposed by the Local Government Code.
          
          Treñas further stated 
          that the cityhood laws also violate the equal protection clause under 
          Section 1, Article III of the Constitution as it unreasonably grants 
          special treatment to these municipalities by exempting them from 
          compliance with the minimum income requirement impose by the Local 
          Government Code.
          
          The six are part of 
          the 16 towns which sought exemption from the requirements of RA 9009. 
          The Congress has so far approved the cityhood laws of the 15 towns 
          despite strong opposition from the LCP.
          
          Sarmiento said the 
          conversion of these “unqualified” towns into cities will set a “bad 
          precedent” and shall invite a deluge of application practically from 
          all towns which have the same status. He said that LCP will be filing 
          similar suits against the other towns as their cityhood bills lapse 
          into law.