DOJ exonerates
Lofrancos over Janine murder case
By IMELDA BONIFACIO
July
30, 2007
CATBALOGAN CITY,
Samar – In a fifty-one page DOJ Joint Resolution dated July 09,
2007, State Prosecutor II Florencio D. dela Cruz, Jr. and 1st
Assistant Provincial Prosecutor Fidel A. Macauyag dismissed the cases
filed by Mary Jean O. Paulin against Drs. Leo and Grace Lofranco and
Jericson D. Tagapan. Dela Cruz and Macauyag, who were designated as
Acting Provincial Prosecutors of Catbalogan Samar, as per Department
Order No. 105 dated January 29, 2007, decided in favor of the three
respondents by dismissing the murder and arson cases filed against
them for insufficiency of evidence to indict respondents to the crimes
charged.
The decision resolved
the complaints for murder and arson filed before the Department of
Justice, which were docketed as IS No. 03230-07 and I.S No. 03231-07
respectively. The exoneration was based on the inability of the
complainant to positively identify or concretely establish the
deliberate involvement of the Lofranco couple and the security guard
in the commission of the alleged crimes.
“Paulin’s charges were
primarily based on suspicions. It did not gave probative force to the
testimony and in itself was insufficient to establish or justify the
inference of a particular fact”, the prosecutors tell. The DOJ
specifically found it highly illogical for the Lofrancos to dump the
body of the deceased inside their biggest grocery, if indeed they were
responsible for her demise. It also cited of the availability of a
wide area in
Samar, both land and water, where a victim of a crime could easily
be concealed or dumped undetected.
It must be recalled
that the sensationalized controversy started when a 14 year old and
2nd year high school student, Candice Janine O. Paulin, was found dead
inside the burned Lester Lace Grocery, owned by the Lofranco couple,
in Catbalogan Samar last November 14, 2006. The complainant felt that
there was impartiality in the initial investigation conducted by the
NBI, thus, the assistance of the Western CIDG was solicited. More
speculations of an alleged commission of crimes of murder and arson
cropped up shortly after Dr. Felino Gualdrapa issued a certification
that Janine was already dead three hours before the fire, which was
believed to be intentionally set to cover the crime previously
committed.
The complainant
received even more support and sympathies from various local and
national religious and civic organizations, especially after the
theorized evidences of the investigation anchored in establishing
a love triangle affair or an extra-marital relationship between Dr.
Leo Lofranco and the deceased. However, the defense lawyers of the
Lofrancos led by Atty. Rolando P. Quimbo, a Catbaloganon, were able to
refute all these allegations in a series of presentation of affidavits
made by credible witnesses that served as the basis for the DOJs final
judgment on the cases.
On the other hand, the
Lofrancos, were overwhelmed by the decision. Even at the very start,
they were very well confident that a fair and just trial, would
exonerate them. On several radio interviews, the couple was heard in
their appeals that they be spared from public trial and condemnation
and expressed their desire to submit themselves to investigation. “We
are also victims in this instance, just like the complainant, thus we
also deserve to be heard. We have trust and confidence in the justice
system”, the Lofrancos were once quoted.
They are finally glad
that they have survived the emotional crisis they went through, the
financial losses that their businesses suffered, and the public
indignation that the cases has caused on their family. “All we need
now is peace of mind. Ayoko na munang magsalita baka iba na naman ang
dating nun para sa kabila. Waiting for the resolution to be handed
down was really stressful. We’ll leave all the rest of the questions
to Atty. Quimbo. We just have to be thankful to everyone who supported
us”, was Dr. Grace Lofranco’s humble answer when asked for an
interview by this writer.
Atty. Rolando
Quimbo, the respondent’s lawyer, conceded to a live radio interview in
the DYMS Program “Panginano-a Daw”. In the said venue, he thanked the
Lofrancos for entrusting their defense to him, the Catbaloganon’s for
carefully looking into the details of the cases, the media for a
balanced airing of the issues and finally, the witnesses, who braved
it all despite the odds. He appealed to all concerned for sobriety and
respect to the decision handed down by the DOJ. Local media has yet to
hear the comments of the complainant on the matter, as of this
writing.