Police torture video affirms police 
          stations are 'torture chambers'
          
          
          A Statement by the 
          Asian Human Rights Commission
          August 19, 2010
          
          On August 17, a 
          national television ABS CBN broadcast the graphic video of a man being 
          tortured by a policeman inside a police station in Tondo, Metro 
          Manila. In the video, the torture victim, whom reports said had been 
          arrested for theft, had his penis pulled by a string tied around it as 
          he was lying on the floor naked. He was beaten every time he folded 
          his body as he tried to reach his genitals in pain. The torture took 
          place in front of several policemen who are also attached to the same 
          police station. 
          
          It was the brave act 
          of the informant, whose identity was kept confidential, that made this 
          video widely known to the public possible. It exposed the state of 
          policing in the Philippines. The video is perhaps shocking for others 
          but what is more shocking is that it is by no means the only one of 
          this type. It is however, the first such video to be made public. As 
          the informant had told the television reporter: these incidents 
          increase if there is an increase in robbery incidents (in the 
          community); and the (police) make sure nobody sees it. It explains the 
          wrong attitude of the police on 'crime prevention'. 
          
          In this video, the 
          policeman who tortured the victim, Senior Inspector Joselito Binayug, 
          is not an ordinary officer. He is the chief of the said police 
          station; and his subordinates were watching him as he was torturing 
          the victim. When he told the victim: "dito bawal ang snatcher 
          (snatchers are prohibited here) ", he was telling him that anyone who 
          commits crimes in his area of responsibility would suffer the same 
          fate. That is what Sr. Insp. Binayug and his subordinates, who did 
          nothing to stop him from torturing the victim, understand of 
          investigation and policing in reality.
          
          To instil fear by 
          demonstrating unthinkable pain and humiliation them remains, for them, 
          the practical and cost-efficient method of investigation. The police 
          took offence at suspected criminals who commit crimes and get away 
          unpunished in their area that is why they deal with them in this 
          manner once they catch them. This is not an isolated case, contrary to 
          what the police establishment would want to tell the public in their 
          defence. This is rather an unwritten policy that is heavily embedded 
          and well-practiced in the minds of the police in investigating and 
          preventing crimes. 
          
          When Police Director 
          Leocadio Santiago, of the National Capital Region Police Office (NCRPO), 
          made comments on the torture video, he said: "I've gone through 
          physical interrogation before. I've conducted it but not to the extent 
          that it would be sadistic, there are boundaries and parameters". His 
          comments had no pretence at all that the policemen, including him, do 
          harm their arrestees; and that this practice is acceptable to a 
          certain extent only the police would know. The notion of the absolute 
          prohibition of torture does exist not in their minds. This type of 
          mentality is deeply embedded and shared largely by the police and the 
          military. 
          
          While this video is 
          now widely known many of these incidents go unreported. The majority 
          of the Filipino people's reaction was disbelief, some would say: "this 
          can't be", also illustrates their denial and difficulty of coming to 
          terms as to how cruel their policemen could become. In a largely 
          religious country, there is supposedly a certain level of behaviour 
          and morals of people in civilized society; however, this incident 
          shatters the people's conservative thought. Only when the people come 
          to terms with this and try to understand the fundamental reasons 
          behind it will the discussion on police torture in the country be 
          substantial. There must be an acceptance first that in the country's 
          supposed civilized society this has s ince been happening. The 
          Filipinos and the outside world have seen how cruel and barbaric the 
          policemen could become. 
          
          This case is neither 
          indiscriminate nor isolated, but rather targeted and systematic 
          practice as methods of investigation and crime prevention by the law 
          enforcement agencies and the security forces. The Asian Human Rights 
          Commission (AHRC) has documented numerous cases of torture that took 
          place inside police station and military camps. This incident also 
          illustrates that torture is also used against ordinary people, not 
          necessarily for political reasons, who often had no connections and 
          influence in the society. They are people whom the police and the 
          military would thought either incapable of or would not challenge 
          their authority. 
          
          The AHRC further urges 
          the concerned government agencies, in particular the Commission on 
          Human Rights (CHR) and the Department of Justice (DoJ), to determine 
          the plight of the torture victim in the video, in addition to having 
          the policemen involved investigated. The investigation, as required by 
          the Anti-Torture Act of 2009, must also be completed immediately. The 
          CHR and the DoJ should also ensure that the informant should be 
          afforded with necessary protection should he decide to stand as 
          witness in the investigation and prosecution of the case. However, 
          regardless of whether the victim wishes to testify, there is 
          sufficient evidence in the video to charge and convict the police 
          officers involved.