Legislative activism
By Fr. ROY CIMAGALA, roycimagala@gmail.com
August
23, 2010
FORMS of activism have
definitely multiplied in trickier, more sinister ways these past
years. The original form is obviously when a person just acts without
much thinking. Even common sense is neglected, and the result can only
be trouble.
Such attitude,
unfortunately, can be infectious, taking advantage of people’s
weaknesses, ignorance and confusion, and thus can be so generalized as
to become part of a society’s culture, with structures to perpetuate
it.
And thus, we can have
such anomalies as workaholism or professionalitis, where action, work
and profession become the be-all and end-all of life. They set aside
time for prayer, family life and our other responsibilities.
But the root cause of
activism is when we detach ourselves from our objective source of
wisdom and truth, and this is nothing other than God. This sadly is
becoming prevalent because of the increasingly secularized environment
we are having these days.
Instead we depend on
our own ideas, mesmerized by their borrowed brilliance and buoyed by
our own pride and vanity. In short, we make ourselves our own God.
This irregularity is reinforced by a badly understood doctrine of the
separation of Church and state that many of us are suffering.
According to this
understanding, the Church cannot say anything on state affairs. In a
worse case, religion or anything that has to do with faith is
automatically banned from making any influence on a country’s
political life. And yet all sorts of ideologies are made to hold sway
over the people.
With this frame of
mind, we start to create a bubble, we start to live in a cocoon.
Reality becomes man-made. We follow a logic that while accompanied by
reason, is ultimately based on hot air. This is where we can talk
about an activism that is driven by ideologies founded on reason alone
without God.
Its allure derives
from the immediate practicality it gives, the instant, short-term
advantages and benefits it produces. But it’s notoriously shallow and
short-sighted, and worse, it tends to be dressed in deceptive devices
to attract attention.
Thus, in the recent
past, we had this disturbing phenomenon of street rallies, where noise
replaced thinking, slogans substituted arguments, and ideologies
attacked faith and our faith-derived culture.
Its falsehood and
inherent infirmity obviously cannot keep the craze long. In time, all
the shouting and marching petered out. It had no genuine soul. It
cannot go far in its dream.
And so, other forms of
activism had been resorted. Lately, we had been “regaled” for a while
by the news that an American judge did what was tantamount to a
judicial activism. That’s when he overturned the results of a
plebiscite that banned same-sex marriage in California.
In his view, there was
no sufficient reason to ban gay unions. He had the pluck to insinuate
that there was more than enough reason homosexual marriages were ok,
were constitutional, if not were moral and natural.
It’s good that a court
stopped his decision, at least for a while, from being implemented. We
have to be ready for this kind of activism that tries to usurp the
right of the majority of the people to be heard in their beliefs.
In our own country, we
have another disturbing phenomenon that is emerging. We can call it
legislative activism, because it involves lawmakers, our congressmen
and congresswomen, who now want to redefine marriage according to
ideological lines.
This time, they want
marriage not to be a lifelong commitment but a renewable affair after
every few years. This is really a wild idea that only shows what’s
inside their mind and heart.
Marriage, by
definition, is a lifelong commitment, because it involves everything
of the parties concerned. We, as persons and especially if we are
aware that we receive grace from God through the sacrament of
marriage, are capable of such commitment.
I’m sure the
proponents want to solve some screaming marital and family problems,
but the proposed solution can open a Pandora’s box of many other worse
problems. With such attitude, where the nature and sanctity of
marriage are eroded, people would have more reason not to take it
seriously.
Besides, the proposal
to legalize “renewable” marriage goes with another on divorce.
Actually these two are twin bastard children of a man-made
understanding of marriage.
We have to
understand that the nature of marriage is given to us by God, written
in nature, and for us to find, discover and live. It’s not for us to
fabricate nor to revise. We need to go back to this basic truth about
marriage.