Silliman University
law team is new champ of 2010 moot court competition on IHL
By ICRC
November
22, 2010
MANILA – The Silliman University team outshined 13 other law schools to emerge as
champions in the recent national moot court competition on
international humanitarian law (IHL).
The team from
Dumaguete City clinched first place in the finals held 20 November at
the Supreme Court en banc session hall. They were adjudged as best
team by a panel of judges led by Associate Justice Maria Lourdes
Sereno and lawyer Harry Roque.
"The finalists were
very well prepared, and it was a very difficult choice. We hope the
winners will do well in Hong Kong – it takes a real character to go in
front of the court and argue your points. Our country needs people
like that, and I hope one day I will see them in the halls of the
Supreme Court again,” said Justice Sereno.
Aside from receiving a
trophy, the Silliman University law team will be sent by the ICRC to
the regional finals in
Hong Kong in 2011. Last year, the winning team from Ateneo de Manila
University ranked as one of the top five prosecution teams in the HK
finals.
A total of 14 law
schools from across the country displayed their argumentation skills
in the annual event organized by the International Committee of the
Red Cross (ICRC), the Philippine Red Cross (PRC), the Philippine
Association of Law Schools (PALS), and the Supreme Court of the
Philippines.
Nine provincial law
schools and five law schools in Metro Manila joined this year's
competition: Silliman, Ateneo de Davao University, St. Louis
University-Baguio, Southwestern University in Cebu, University of Cebu,
University of San Carlos in Cebu, University of Batangas, University
of St. La Salle in Bacolod, Xavier University-Ateneo de Cagayan,
Ateneo de Manila University, Far Eastern University, Lyceum of the
Philippines, San Beda College of Law and University of the
Philippines-Diliman.
San Sebastian College
Manila played host for the elimination and semifinal rounds. "It's the
second time for our school to join but it's my first," said Phoebeth
Peras, a junior law student from the
University of
Cebu.
"If you're prepared for the match, then it's only your sense of
confidence that can harm your presentation."
But lawyer Neil Silva,
a former mooter and one of the judges for the elimination round, said
he was “very impressed” with the students. “They were able to combine
comprehensiveness and depth, which is usually not easy to combine.
They were well-prepared to sustain the most difficult questions on IHL,"
he observed.
An "IHL role-play
challenge" was also introduced this year to simulate practical
applications of the law that seeks to limit the effects of war. For
this challenge, the students were asked to act as an ICRC delegate, a
military officer, reporter, or civilian dealing with an armed-conflict
situation.
Southwestern
University was declared the best team for the role-play challenge.
They were awarded books on IHL for their effective performance.
"We've worked really
hard to prepare for the moot court competition, but it was a real
challenge, particularly the role play. But it was worth it! We've made
some many new friends, and being in the en banc hall of the Supreme
court makes it really special," said best mooter Micah Dagaerag of
Silliman.
The moot court contest
began in 2005 with only six participating schools but it is now
considered a prestigious event for law students, being the only moot
court competition that is allowed to hold its finals in the high
tribunal's en banc session hall.
"I hope more schools
will join the moot court competition in the years to come because it
gives the students an alternate means of training and learning. It
also exposes them to international law, which I discovered myself to
be a very dynamic field," added Silva.
As part of its IHL
program for the academe, the ICRC also supported the publication of
the third volume of the Asia-Pacific IHL Yearbook, which was launched
by the UP-Institute of International Legal Studies on 17 November.
The ICRC is a neutral
and impartial organization that assists and protects victims of armed
conflicts. As guardian of IHL, it reminds parties to the conflict of
their obligation under this law to spare the lives of civilians and to
treat them with humanity and dignity.