Greenpeace calls on
Philippine government to abandon Bt Talong
By GREENPEACE
October
2, 2010
QUEZON CITY,
Philippines – Greenpeace and other members of the Network Opposed to
Genetically Modified Organisms (NO2GMOs) on Wednesday called on the
government to immediately stop all field trials of genetically
engineered Bt Talong, a.k.a. Bt Eggplant, and follow the example of
the Indian government, which declared a moratorium on the
commercialisation of the vegetable, citing safety concerns.
Dr. Pushpa Bhargava,
one of the world’s foremost biologists, and member of the Genetic
Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) of India, warned the
Philippines’ Department of Agriculture about the dangers of conducting
open field trials of Bt Eggplant in the absence of adequate and
accurate scientific data and testing of its impact on environment and
human health. Dr. Bhargava spoke at a forum conducted by Greenpeace
and the NO2GMOs network today at the Environmental Studies Institute
of Miriam College.
The Bt Eggplant (“Brinjal”
in India), purportedly designed to be Fruit-and-Shoot-Borer-Resistant,
was created with the insertion of a gene [Cry 1Ac] from the soil
bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (hence the name “Bt”), along with
other genes like promoters, markers etc. This gives the eggplant
resistance against lepidopteron insects or “borers”. It is reported
that upon ingestion of the Bt toxin by the insect, its digestive
processes are disrupted, ultimately resulting in its death.
“I was taken aback by
the poor scientific quality of the report, which neither tells the
entire truth nor has taken into account the enormous amount of highly
reliable scientific literature on the various risks of GE crops,” Dr.
Bhargava said in reference to the recent report, submitted to the
Indian government by the six science academies of India, which
declared it safe for cultivation and human consumption. The report in
question is based solely on the dossier and studies made by the local
subsidiary of Monsanto in India, the Maharashtra Hybrid Seed Company (Mahyco),
which created Bt Eggplant.
According to Dr.
Bhargava, no proteomics studies were conducted to make sure that no
harmful chemicals were generated during the process of genetic
modification. Toxicity studies were also limited to a 90-day
observation, when a longer chronic toxicity study is recommended to
examine, for example, the possibilities of tumors or cancer
development. An intergenerational study is also required to determine
the effects of genetic modification on subsequent generations.
As for the eggplant
itself, the Monsanto dossier used a different toxin (improper Cry1
toxin) from the one found in Bt Egplant, rendering the toxicity test
in the report useless. Bt Eggplant also has a different alkaloid
content, and much lower kcal can be obtained from it, compared to
natural eggplants, which goes against claims by GE proponents that Bt
Eggplant will be beneficial to Filipinos. It also has resistance to
streptomycin, a widely used antibiotic. Scientists are worried that
this trait may be transferred to other organisms, such as people or
viruses, which may render antibiotic medicines useless.
“There are seven sites
chosen for the field trials of Bt eggplant this coming October and the
town of Sta. Maria in Pangasinan, where eggplant is the number one
high value crop, is among them. Most of the government officials,
farmers and residents are unaware of the risks that could result from
conducting these field trials,” said Atty. Lee Aruelo of the Third
World Network another member organisation of NO2GMOs. “Contamination
of traditional and indigenous varieties of eggplant will have a
detrimental effect on the production of non-genetically engineered
eggplant in Pangasinan and all the other trials sites.”
NO2GMOs is asking the
government to at least hold off plans to commercialize Bt Eggplant
until plausible independent studies and proper public consultations
are carried out.
“GE proponents
should stop pulling their money and influence to force field testing
in communities that are not informed, much less prepared. We need
more conclusive scientific proof that risks are effectively eliminated
before we can even consider field testing. It’s very risky, the
conditions are not as easy to control as in a confined lab. We don’t
know the rate of contamination and what this unnatural fusion can do
to other crops, much less to other organisms and people who consume
agricultural products. Where is the consultative process in all
this?” asked Daniel M. Ocampo, Sustainable Agriculture Campaigner of
Greenpeace Southeast Asia, one of the member organizations of NO2GMOs.