Yellowing journalism
By Fr. ROY CIMAGALA, roycimagala@gmail.com
October
10, 2010
EVERYONE is familiar
with what is called “yellow journalism,” that kind that is screaming
and sensationalistic, not averse to exaggerating things and even
inventing and staging events to grab people’s attention.
Yellowing journalism
is the process involved in making it. It’s a dynamic mix of many
elements and factors, conditions and circumstances, multi-layered and
multi-threaded, whose course is uncharted, like an adventure that
gives suspense and excitement, except that it can end in a big
destructive mess.
The media coverage of
the current RH bill controversy reminds me of this yellowing
journalism. All the ingredients seem to be present and made to stew.
There’s passion and emotion, slogans and buzz words, myths and
speculations. Biases and questionable ideologies are the driving
forces.
If reason is ever
used, it is made to serve the passions. Faith, that is supposed to
guide reason, is considered Public Enemy Number One in what is
supposed to be an objective pursuit for what is good for us. In fact,
there’s a shrill cry for liberation from Church, faith, religion and
the like.
This yellowing
journalism is not associated with the tabloids. It affects more the
broadsheets, the more standard and mainstream brand of journalism.
They have become vulnerable because of certain journalistic
requirements that have been neglected.
Most of the media
practitioners, from publishers down to the reporters, do not know the
relation between faith and reason, between religion and their work,
the spiritual and material aspects of man, Church and state, etc.
These things are
considered abstract and academic and are kept that way, with no effort
to convert them into something concrete and practical. If ever they
have to acknowledge these values, it’s mainly just lip service, for
photo-ops, and not much more.
Those who still care
about their faith are ashamed to show it, let alone, to shape and
define the character of their work and their life. So they become easy
target to atheistic and agnostic sophistries that are often stuffed
with immediate practical benefits.
In fact, they usually
frame issues like the RH Bill within a strictly economic or social
point of view, as if problems are solved only in these levels. Purely
human means are flaunted as our authentic savior. This is the tyranny
of this kind of attitude. It shuts out the inputs of faith.
Besides, they cite the
scandals in the Church as reason to discredit the faith, a clear
example of throwing the baby out with the bath water. As if there are
no scandals in other places, forgetting we are all humans, with our
own share of shortcomings irrespective of where we are placed.
Remember that there
was a Judas among the apostles. And Judases can spring up anywhere
anytime. That’s always a possibility, given our weakened human
condition.
Our attitude should
rather be to help one another, and be objective in distinguishing
between the truths involved in an issue, derived from faith and our
human sciences, and the personalities involved, between the office and
the occupant, between the doctrine and the way it is lived.
Faith-based morality
is placed at the margins, since nowadays it seems to be the fad to
deem morality to be nothing other than a result of economic, social,
political and other human and earthly considerations. Sorry, but with
this attitude, we are in deepening trouble. We won’t be getting
nowhere.
Since faith requires
grace, then effort, often torturous, and even sacrifice, it’s no
surprise it many times loses to the practicality of reason unburdened
by faith.
What aggravates this
situation is the phenomenon of strange creatures who call themselves
Catholics only to go against the Catholic faith. Their Catholicism is
self-produced, self-arrogated and self-inflicted. They go around
proudly proclaiming they are Catholics for Choice.
These, I think, are
the deadly elements present in yellowing journalism. They thrive in an
environment stirred by emotions and passions, with reason playing
second fiddle. Faith is ridiculed and ostracized. The crisis is at
bottom a question of faith in relation to our earthly affairs.
Worsening things is
the emerging reality that much of what we see in the press today
regarding the RH Bill seems to be orchestrated by a tremendous
machinery of public relation outfits, clearly funded by moneyed
international groups and helped by their local lackeys, the NGOs, etc.
The fingerprints are all over.
Unless faith is
given a fair hearing in this debate, I don’t think we can really
resolve this issue properly. Faith, the very soul of our reason, has
to be given its proper place.