Greenpeace slams DA on
Bt Eggplant
Demands a stop to
experimental field trials
By GREENPEACE
October
29, 2010
MANILA – Greenpeace
today slammed the Department of Agriculture (DA) for failing to put
the brakes on planned field trials of the genetically engineered (GE)
Bt eggplant, even as more provinces are banning what are essentially
risky genetic experiments in their localities. Greenpeace is warning
the government to heed the example of India, which has declared a
moratorium on the commercialization of the genetically modified
vegetable on safety concerns.
“The DA has to be more
on the ball when it comes to the Bt talong issue. Once again the
Philippines is accepting another country’s rejects. A few years ago,
the government wanted us to eat genetically-tainted US rice that other
countries refused to import. Now they want to turn the country into a
guinea pig for a risky experimental food crop already rejected by
India.
This is scandalous and completely unacceptable. What is the DA
thinking?” said Daniel Ocampo, Greenpeace Southeast Asia Sustainable
Agriculture campaigner.
“GE crop field trials
are experiments that cannot yield any success because they are
inherently risky. Bt eggplant field trials will endanger conventional
eggplant varieties with irreversible genetic contamination and will
eventually threaten farmers’ livelihoods. It will also put at risk
the health of Filipinos. No GMO has ever been proven safe for human
consumption and the evidence that these organisms pose long-term
threats is growing. The DA must listen to provinces who have refused
to be part of this folly,” he added.
Two of the seven
selected sites for field trials – the City of
Davao
and Sta Barbara, Iloilo – have already issued provincial resolutions
to ban field testing. Other proposed test sites in Pangasinan,
Laguna, Camarines Sur, Leyte, and North Cotabato are in the process of
passing similar statutes. Recent reports state that Bt eggplant
proponents now refuse to divulge the date and time of planting, in
blatant disregard of the public’s right to know of matters that have
serious implications on community health. Incidentally, the DA’s
go-ahead for Bt eggplant testing was given under a similar
non-consultative process.
Bt eggplant is a GE
crop that has a built-in pesticide intended to kill the eggplant fruit
and shoot borer insect. As with all GMOs, no long-term studies on the
effects on humans and the environment has ever been conducted.
Moreover, GMO field tests are particularly risky. Pollen in an
uncontained environment will travel and cause the GE crop to
crossbreed with conventional varieties. The effects are near
impossible to reverse, and the GE crop industry currently offers no
solutions. The most serious example of such experimental
contamination is the Bayer LL601 GE rice case. Planted as an
experiment in 2001 in Arkansas, USA and subsequently abandoned as a
failure, it silently contaminated US rice stocks in three states and
was not detected until 2006.
Bt eggplant was
developed based on experiments done on eggplant in India, but plans
for its commercialization in the country were halted early this year
due to safety concerns. Last month, Dr. Pushpa Bhargava, an eminent
geneticist and member of the Indian Genetic Engineering Appraisal
Committee, sent a letter to DA Secretary Prospero Alcala urging a
halt on the field trials pending an actual assessment of the need for
the GE crop has been determined, and if there is, after proper
laboratory testing have been carried out.
“Even before one
decides to develop a genetically modified crop, one must determine if
it is needed and if so, if there are cheaper and better alternatives.
In the case of Brinjal (eggplant), we certainly do not need it in
India, and the alternatives to the Bt gene in the Brinjal are many,
such as organic agriculture, integrated pest management and use of
biopesticides," said Dr. Bhargava. "There are known and established
numerous health, agricultural, environmental, and social hazards of
open release of GE crops. In no case so far, any of these hazards
have been evaluated properly, professionally and objectively; in the
case of most hazards, no evaluation has been done at all for any GE
crop till today."
Greenpeace maintains
that GE crops are not the way forward to sustainable agriculture.
Neither are GE crops endorsed by the IAASTD (International Assessment
on Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development) as
a solution to food security.
“It would be a grave
mistake for the DA to pursue the field trials for Bt eggplant. We are
calling on Secretary Alcala to stop the GE Bt eggplant trials and
instead focus on technologies that will give the most benefit to
farmers and consumers such as ecological agriculture which does not
rely onGE crops or agrochemicals,” said Ocampo.
Greenpeace campaigns
for GMO-free crop and food production grounded on the principles of
sustainability, protection of biodiversity, and providing all people
access to safe and nutritious food. Genetic engineering is an
unnecessary and unwanted technology that contaminates the environment,
threatens biodiversity, and poses unacceptable risks to health.