You know this, you
know this Atty. Yong! wailed Arcales in court
By GINA DEAN-RAGUDO,
Samar News.com
September
6, 2010
CALBAYOG CITY – You
know this! You know this Atty. Yong! says former Samar Vice-Governor
now Catbalogan City Councilor Ernesto Arcales during a court hearing
of TRO extension last
September 3, 2010 at
RTC Branch 31 Calbayog.
Arcales, was referring
to some probabilities if the budget will undergo DBM review at the
Regional Office 8. The exhaustion of administrative remedy is provided
for by law, but there are certain exemptions especially when the
matter is so urgent that even DBM review maybe futile.
He added that the
irregular, invalid ordinance was enacted by the Sangguniang
Panlalawigan on
August 26, 2010 and allegedly approved by the governor on the same
day. Since September 1, checks have been prepared, kept in the office
of the provincial treasurer and attempted to encash the checks at Land
Bank Catbalogan.
“The exhaustion of
administrative remedies is sometimes liberalized. If we wait for the
DBM review, I don’t know how much from the P1.2 Billion will still
remain”, stressed Arcales.
The purpose of DBM
review is not about stopping the disbursement of the budget. The court
is the proper forum that can block any act of release by way of a
special civil action.
Arcales statements was
sustained by Atty. Roger Casurao who disclosed that accountant’s
advice was made and they are aware of the check numbers issued as
enumerated in the document prepared by no less than the provincial
accountant.
To support the
petitioners’ allegations, Assistant Provincial Accountant Frank
Detosil was made to testify in court. He admitted having talked
personally with the provincial treasurer on September 2 and confirmed
that there were adjustments formulated under a new rate in the payroll
of the provincial employees; and this was done under the instruction
of the Budget Officer. Since the approval of the controversial budget,
local financing offices have been very busy working overtime or until
wee hours in the morning. Checks have been issued on August 27, the
day after the approval of 2010 budget.
Samarnews.com was able
to get hold a copy of the unsigned Accountant’s Advice and contained
therein are the names of the special disbursing officers in charge of
the salaries and wages of the employees with the corresponding checks
accumulating a total amount of P38, 462, 302.
Detosil said that an
Accountant’s Advice is an added mechanism on the part of the agency
issuing the checks which is a confirmation of the authenticity,
regularity of the checks issued – giving “go signal” to the bank.
Ultimately, the issue
was resolved on the propriety of extending the Temporary Restraining
Order. The September 3 hearing was the last day of the 72-hour TRO
issued by the court effective
August 31, 2010 upon petition filed by the seven board members headed
by Majority Floor Leader Charlie Coñejos.
After more or less 3
hours debating in court, incorporating the following issues: a) the
capacity i.e. personal or official of the respondents in relation to
the act/s committed surrounding the approval of the budget; b) the
representation of the counsels (Atty. Alex Gelera, Calbayog City
Councilor Rogelio Casurao and Catbalogan City Councilor Ernesto
Arcales) knowing their present status as holders of elective and/or
appointive positions in the government; c) and the banner story
entitled “Majority Pushes
TRO to Block Budget Release” published at Samarnews.com on
September 3 that caused adverse effect on the part of the respondents
as they perceived it to be a misinformation to the public, it was
resolved in favor of the petitioners.
Based on the arguments
presented, the court found the testimony of Assistant Provincial
Accountant Frank Detosil convincing; that there’s a need to expedite
the disposition of the case as it involves the P1.2 Billion budget of
the province. To uphold the status quo so that no other act/s be
effected involving the seriously questioned annual budget and to
protect the funds of the public, it finally decided to extend the
Temporary Restraining Order for another 17 days enjoining all the
respondents from implementing the 2010 budget. They were given 10 days
to comment from the oral issuance of said
TRO.