Majority Bloc
justifies no-show, no-quorum and change of venue of scheduled SP’s
regular sessions in Calbayog City
By EMY C. BONIFACIO,
Samar News.com
August
3, 2011
CATBALOGAN CITY –
The internal rules of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan of the Province of
Samar provide that its regular sessions will be held every Thursday of
the week at exactly 10:00 in the morning at the Provincial Capitol
Building, Catbalogan City.
However, for almost a
year now, the usual scene on Thursdays at the Sangguniang Panlalawigan
Session Hall could either be a no-show, a no-quorum or a change of
venue for these scheduled sessions.
“These Board Members
have been remiss of their duties and responsibilities. It’s quite
disappointing that they are getting paid regularly, yet they do not
deliver what is expected of them”, are just a few of the adverse
reactions that is being heard from Samar constituents who hope that
these Board Members would stop politicking, forget their own interests
and start working for the people who have given them the mandate to
serve.
For quite a time, the
majority bloc who are mostly coming from the 1st District of Samar,
were blamed, but they remained silent. However, in a regular session
held recently, the legislators from the opposition have broke their
silence calling for the Samarnons to listen to what they consider are
the real circumstances.
Hon. Jasper Sumagang,
in a formal motion, manifested for the holding of the succeeding
August 4 regular session in
Calbayog City.
He cited as its legal basis, the Internal Rules of the Legislative
Council that allows the transfer of venue of the next session for as
long as it is agreed upon by the Body and it will be within the
jurisdictional area of any of the two Legislative Districts in Samar.
On the other hand,
Hon. Eunice Babalcon’s defense dwells on the practicality issue when
Hon. Juan Latorre demanded for the citing of a factual reason for the
transfer of the session’s venue and jokingly manifested that the next
session after Calbayog City be held in Daram.
“We know that there is
a legal basis, but, what about practicality? That should be what is
supposed to be raised by Hon. Latorre, the practicality of going to
Calbayog City considering that it has distance, a relative distance
from Catbalogan City. But, nonetheless, Mr. Chair, may I just tell you
that notwithstanding that this representation has been deprived of
their fuel allowance, gasoline allowances and other members are being
given their fuel allocations, their casual allocations and all other
perks of the Sagguniang Panlalawigan, I will go there to Calbayog City
to support that proposed resolution because we know for a fact that it
is our duty to bring the government closer to our people” explains
Babalcon.
Hon. Conejos revealed
that since the assumption of the Tans, they have been deprived of
their fuel allowances, cellphone cards, office supplies and traveling
allowances. Conejos explained that such funds are provided in the
Miscellaneous and Other Operating Expenses (MOOE) for every department
and the office of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan is not exempted from
such provision.
“Even if the budget is
reenacted, there is that MOOE where our privileges can be sourced out,
but they are the ones who control the signing and they are doing it
purposely to satisfy their whims and caprices,” affirms Conejos.
“May I ask you, what
makes Hon Latorre or Soza or Nacario distinct from any of the members
in the council? They get brand new vehicles, di ba? Why are they so
privileged? Tama gad liwat hiya nga you should not feed your enemies,
but they are the ones who declared that we are enemies. We never
declared that we are enemies. Mayda la kami mga differences because
that’s part of democracy.” was Hon. Babalcon’s adverse reaction to
Hon. Latorre’s quick statement in one of the media ambush interviews,
saying “Why feed the enemies?”
Hon. Sermense even
commented to Hon. Latorre’s note as uncalled for and an uncivilized
one. “That is political cannibalism”, says Sermense.
An inquiry into the
budget allocations for the Sanggunaing Panlalawigan would show that
even under a reenacted budget, items were provided for fuel, cell
card, travel and salaries/wages for the staff of each and every Board
Member. However, the majority claims that they have not been receiving
any of those privileges since July 2010. The wages of their staff are
likewise provided in the 2010 budget. All other pro-administration
Board members continue to receive checks for their supplies and
travels. A total amount of P2.8 million for traveling allowances was
disclosed.
Once and for all, the
majority Board members reminded the Tans that the Provincial Budget is
not only for the administration allies.
“The Provincial Budget
contains public money. Public Office is a public trust and all these
offices emanate from the people. All these money are sourced from
people’s taxes. Thus, all government authority emanates from the
people. If you will check on the budget allocations, it is intended
for the Office of the Governor, Office of the Vice Governor, Office of
the Sangguniang Panlalawigan., etc. It is intended for the offices
concerned and not just for one person” justifies Conejos.
Hopefully, the
Samarnons who are mostly affected by the growing feud between these
two factions are expecting that both camps would finally discuss and
settle these indifferences soon, for the interest of the constituents
whom they have vowed to serve.