Medical practice – the
poor are likely to die
By DANILO REYES, AHRC
August
31, 2011
The common phrase that
the poor suffers the most, in all aspects of life, is not difficult to
comprehend. But no one could ever grasp the depth of the poor's
suffering in a life in which he was conditioned to live. It is not
like an experimental exposure where a person can immerse himself in a
situation in order to get a feel, knowing full well that he can simply
step out of it when it becomes too much for him.
The experience I had
as to how the disadvantaged suffer from the poor state of the medical
practice in the Philippines is limited to me, my family and my
relatives. I could articulate the experiences of the others but it
would be broad and in an abstract idea as to how they have suffered;
and my evidence to those experiences are anecdotal.
Yes. If you are poor,
you have no political connection, you are not known to the medical
service provider and if the latter thinks you have no education, you
are likely to die.
Recently, I took my
family for a holiday in my wife's hometown, a remote village in the
southern part of the Philippines. After having been away for over two
years, I thought of our travel as good experience for our two
children, the eldest of which is five; and youngest, two. The latter
was born in Hong Kong and has not been seen by our relatives since he
was born.
A few days after we
arrived, both children fell ill. One eldest had fever and was
vomiting; and the youngest had loose bowels. In the village there are
no taxis; there is an ambulance service but there is no way to contact
them. In an emergency the villagers take the patients, some of whom
are even dying, to the hospital by themselves – if not on foot, on a
public bus or passenger jeep at the highway. These means of transport
are only available about ten to twenty minutes walking distance from
the house were we stay.
It was high noon, I
carried my eldest and my wife our youngest to the highway to go to the
hospital which was almost an hour away from where we were staying.
After waiting for the passenger jeep to arrive we then had to wait
until it was full as the driver was reluctant to leave without a full
jeepney.
For me it was an
emergency. Try to imagine the scene inside the jeep: I was carrying a
plastic bag for my daughter to vomit in; and my wife, who was carrying
our boy, was making sure the contents of the malfunctioning diaper of
low quality (the best available) did not spill out of his pants. We
waited in agony of despair for the jeepney to leave for the nearby
town where the hospital is.
Finally we were there.
We immediately went into the emergency section of the provincial
hospital. Here, I saw an ambulance parked by the door and I wondered
how it might be possible to contact the service. I did not see any
sign or instructions on how to contact the ambulance service. At that
time, I did not bother to find out. I had my two children with me
right at the door to the emergency room. It had taken an hour and now
we were just as worried and clueless as no one was telling us what to
do.
Along the hallway, a
hospital staff (probably a nurse), who did not bother introducing
herself, asked us why we were there. She didn't stop to talk to us and
we had to walk along with her. I had always assumed that in an
emergency room where the lives of patients are at stake you do not
waste time. Surely, no one would go to such a place unless it was a
genuine emergency. Was it necessary for this nurse to ask such an
obvious question? Apparently it was.
In an emergency
situation the first duty of the hospital staff is to ascertain the
immediate situation of the patient. However, without making any such
inquiries the nurse arrogantly asked why we did not bring our sick
children earlier. Before I was able to answer she told us that if we
wanted to have our children attended to by a doctor, we would have to
choose between submitting them for admission or just go away.
She then arrogantly
demanded to know as to why we were unaware that the doctors at the
provincial hospital only serve patients half day every Saturday. Thus,
even if we admitted our children they would not be attended to by a
doctor until one or two days later.
It was only after I
told the hospital staff that we lived in
Hong Kong and were staying at a nearby town, that she took the time to
explain to us properly how we could get treatment at the hospital;
something that should have been a part of her normal duties. My
siblings and friends has told me that we were only likely to be
accommodated by government employees, such as hospital staff, if they
thought we had money, or were a professional and, most importantly, if
you arrived at the hospital in a private car.
In this instance all
we had was this arrogant woman to deal with. There was no one dealing
with newly arriving patients, their conditions being an emergency or
otherwise.
There was no apparent
system or mechanism. I did not see any instructions on what the newly
arriving patient should do to get registered and treated; that they
are only open half days on Saturdays; that a patient could be admitted
without being examined by a doctor; that patients have to wait until
the doctors are available. There were no instructions, only posters
from the health department on general public announcements.
When I realised this,
what came to mind was not me and my two sick children, but how
terribly the poor and ordinary person might suffer daily when they
seek treatment from that government hospital in an emergency. Our case
was vastly different. At least I had an idea of how to deal with
government employees and we, at least, could also afford to go to a
private doctor and hospital.
I was told how
patients were refused treatment in health centers and hospitals for
very petty reasons. My sister-in-law told me a story about an
indigenous child, who came down with a relative from a far flung
village in the mountains, sent away by health worker in the village
because he did not carry proof that he was a resident there. The
patient, whose foot was badly swollen was in pain, was refused
treatment by the health center. The boy and his relatives had to leave
the health center without being treated.
In the remote and far
flung villages, villagers do not bother securing referral letters or
any documents to prove that they are residents of that village. Most
villagers know who live in their village regardless of how far a
distance neighbor's house is from the other. The indigenous people,
unless they could not remedy the illness in their own, also prefer to
treat their patients on their own because – firstly, hardly any of
them had any experience of getting treatment from medical services;
secondly, hospitalization and medication means you need a lot of money
which they do not have.
Even if you can afford
to pay or are covered by health insurance in private hospitals, the
doctors and hospital staffs make money from you in their own way.
Unlike in Hong Kong,
the doctor's fee when you go to private doctors and hospitals in the
Philippines is only for the consultation. Medicine is not included.
The doctor would prescribe a medicine for you to buy at the private
pharmacies outside. The prescription of medicine is where the doctors
get money or commission from medical representatives (MedRep). The
medical representatives are persons selling medicines for doctors to
prescribe. They also have their own way of checking at pharmacies as
to whose doctors prescribed what medicine.
Thus, when my wife and
I fell sick few days later, the medicines prescribed by a doctor at a
private hospital, which could possibly be cheap had it been prescribed
as a generic brand, were very expensive. Usually private doctors in
private clinics asked the patients what they do for a living (which
has absolutely nothing to do your sickness) before prescribing
medicines. The medicine that the patient would get depends on the
patient's response – depending on the doctor's judgment as to whether
the person can afford or not.
At the private
hospital where my wife and I went, I could hear a female patient who
was sitting next to me, trying to explain to a hospital nurse (who was
attending to three to four patients at once) that she be admitted for
treatment. The nurse refused to register her because she had no money
to pay and she could also not produce a document showing the bus
company would cover her hospital expenses. She was being a victim of
the bus accident. The patient had not been admitted even after we left
the hospital.
Doctors are subject to
rules and regulation by the law and the medical profession. To refuse
treatment to needy patients is illegal; however, hospitals and health
centers gets away from it by not putting them on record in the first
place. They do not have any liability or any responsibility to any
patient where they do not have any records of them.