Pajero as the new
wedge
By Fr. ROY CIMAGALA, roycimagala@gmail.com
July
5, 2011
IF it were not
ridiculously funny, I would have been gravely mortified, even
devastated. But I think that the government expose that some bishops
received Pajeros from the PCSO of the previous administration had no
aim other than to embarrass these bishops and drive a wedge into the
Church.
It’s a demolition job
of the lowest and thoughtless kind, reeking of rash judgments,
detraction, malice, unfair innuendoes, self-righteousness, etc. It’s a
very clumsy political operation that speaks badly more of its
perpetrators than of its intended victims.
Its authors try to
tell people that a government agency giving Pajeros to some bishops
only has one interpretation, theirs. There can be no other possible
scenario. In their political game plan, they want to inflict their own
exclusive twisted view on all of us.
It’s a puny
declaration of war, abetted by the media, that will only go pfffft,
since it would require from us that we don’t think, that we let go of
our common sense, that we have to automatically think badly of some
people and of some transactions, etc.
Where is the respect
for freedom and responsibility, and for the dignity of persons, when
people are automatically held guilty for the mere act of receiving
Pajeros from a government agency?
If it were not a
demolition job, then why single out these bishops? Did that agency
give Pajeros and we don’t know what else only to them? Were there no
other recipients – politicians in all their shifting colors, relatives
of politicians, other religious leaders, etc.?
If it were not a
demolition job, then why would they give the impression to the public
that the mere giving by a government agency of cars to some bishops is
intrinsically wrong?
Does that mean that
bishops in all instances cannot receive these benefits, while others
can? Does that mean that there can be no justification for such act of
generosity on the part of the government to bishops?
If it were not a
demolition job, why bring this accusation to the public only now? Was
this practice limited only to a certain period of time, that of the
previous administration? Could it not be that it is very politically
motivated, since Church people are now more vocal about certain
government maneuvers that clearly are immoral?
This unfortunate
affair reminds me of what St. Augustine once said: “Let us never assume that if we live good lives
we will be without sin. Our lives should be praised only when we
continue to beg for pardon.
“But men are hopeless
creatures, and the less they concentrate on their own sins, the more
interested they become in the sins of others.”
This, I think, is what
is happening here. We are too quick to judge others, not realizing
that we all need to ask for pardon because we are all sinners, and we
just have to help one another do this. The Church, let’s remember, is
not so much a museum of saints as it is a hospital of sinners.
Sad to say, the right
of Church leaders to make pronouncements on the morality of certain
government and public issues is not yet well understood by many public
officials. And I think it is not because of lack of explanations. It
is more of hardheadedness of some officials, if not worse things, like
atheism, agnosticism, etc.
What worsens this
affair is that some clerics are buying the demolitioners’ line,
falling into their web, unwittingly playing crucial roles in the
demolitioners’ storybook. Obviously, this is what the demolitioners
want to happen – to insert a wedge among them, bishops and priests, if
not the Church as a whole.
In their reckless,
off-the-cuff comments, these bishops and priests reinforce the
political angle of the car donations, making blanket judgments on the
acts of their fellow bishops and priests.
Sorry, but I find that
self-righteous and grossly imprudent. If ever there has to be some
investigation of some actuations of bishops, would it not be better to
do it in a proper venue, far from where things can easily be
misinterpreted? This is usually done in all cases, unless dirty
politics is involved.
Obviously, not
everyone has the same right to know everything about certain cases.
That scenario is reserved to the Last Judgment, not here. Otherwise,
we would have a mob rule, and further grave injustices can be
committed. Pieces of evidence lending credence to this claim are just
aplenty.
We should stop wasting
our time making these reckless public accusations.