The Mindanao Power
Summit: It’s the power cartel, stupid!
By TUCP Partylist
April
12, 2012
QUEZON CITY – “It is
time for the
Mindanao power summit to call a spade a spade – the cause of the power crisis –
present and near future – is a power cartel. They are made up of six
families: Aboitiz, Lopez, Pangilinan, Ang and Cojuangco, Alcantara,
and Sy,” said Trade Union Congress Party (TUCP) Rep. Raymond Democrito
C. Mendoza. “These families have definitively carved up specific areas
of the country so that all three island grids are now in thrall of an
electricity monopsony,” explained
Mendoza.
“The real question
that should be posed in the Mindanao power summit is: Why has
government compromised national energy policy and national energy
security to the greed of the few? Ten years after the Electric Power
Industry Reform Act (EPIRA) was supposed to bring in private players
with deep pockets to invest in needed capacity, there is now a looming
undercapacity. With most of National Power Corporation (NPC) assets in
private hands, competition was expected to drive down rates but
instead there are threats of brownouts and the endless upward
spiralling of electricity rates. But instead the oligarchs and their
friends would have us believe that it is the fault of Mindanao for
trying to hold on to its policy regime of cheap hydropower,” explained
Mendoza.
“Now we would have
their agents and apologists in high places further add to the
disinformation by blaming what is happening to Mindanao on the
Mindanaoans being “spoiled” and by convincing all that Mindanaoans
should now bite the bullet,” said Mendoza, referring to the Department
of Energy (DOE)/National Electrification Administration (NEA)-sponsored
power supply contracts between the Aboitiz-Therma Marine power barges
selling electricity at P14 per kilowatt hour (kWh) to eight (8)
electric cooperatives.
“Unfortunately,
contrary to the truly best intentions of Mindanao Development
Authority (MinDA) Secretary Luwalhati Antonino, the DOE would have the
Mindanao power summit transformed into a footmark in history to sweep
the inconvenient truth under the rug. By coming up with the grand plan
of forcing electric cooperatives to buy expensive diesel power from
the Aboitiz-owned Therma Marine power barges, the DOE would want the
summit to legitimize the de facto power of oligarchs to control our
access to power and its resultant costs,” said Mendoza.
“High-ranking
officials are saying let us stop trying to hold people to account for
the brownouts. Somehow they miss the point that you cannot provide a
technical answer – power barge-provided electricity – to a political
question – the cartelization of the power industry. We must definitely
demand accountability for those bringing up our power rates so that we
are now the highest in Asia while not investing in additional capacity
to prevent power shortages,” said Mendoza.
TUCP points out that
these families frequently control the industry through the vertical
integration of the power production and electricity distribution
functions. Power is generated by the Aboitiz group and sold to the
Aboitiz-held Davao Light and Power and Visayas Electric Corporation.
In like manner, Pangilinan-owned plants sell power to the Pangilinan-owned
MERALCO to distribute. “So within the areas carved out by each
oligarch, there is no competition at all and instead we have
“sweetheart deals” which drive rates up between the generator and the
distributor,” said Mendoza.
“TUCP predicts that
the power crisis will extend to Visayas and
Mindanao because it is not in the interest of the power cartel to
build additional capacity. They will wait fully knowing that growing
demand will bring about a shortage in supply. Then they will step in
pretending to be a white knight with expensive stop-gap measures based
on coal or bunker fuel,” explained Mendoza.
“The Board of
Investments (BOI) has now moved to remove tax holidays from those
endeavouring to put in new fossil fuel baseload plants. We believe
that this move was lobbied for by the power cartel. It means that the
mobilization costs for new players will be so prohibitive that it will
discourage them from coming in. Also, the six families are signalling
that if new players want to come in, they must partner only with one
of the cartel,” said
Mendoza.
“They are tinkering around with our tax laws and customs codes to rob
our consumers and workers,” he said.
TUCP explained that
the removal of tax holidays will bring up the cost of existing coal
plants by an additional P280 million annually which will be borne by
workers and consumers as part of the pass-through charges of the
generating plants. Because there will be no real competition in the
generating sector, the bias will be to rely on building additional
coal plants which will further bring the costs of tariffs up. TUCP and
the Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industries (PCCI) have jointly
warned that the
Philippines
now charges the fourth highest power rates in the world which may
drive investors away.
“The President – if
the DOE Secretary does not have the will to do it – can immediately
order the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) to reform the rate-making
formula known as performance-based ratemaking so as to moderate the
overly generous rates of return we allow the cartel,” explained
Mendoza. TUCP pointed out that some generating corporations are making
over 50% return on rate base and siphoning their respective earnings
to stock dispersal, dividends, bonuses, foreign expansion or
diversification instead of investing in additional capacity. TUCP also
lamented that the rate of return is based not on the investment cost
of the plant but on the replacement cost which may be twice or thrice
that of the original cost of plant.
“TUCP will also
introduce legislation to once more bring down power costs by
classifying the power generation sector as a utility under the Public
Utility Law. That way we can provide a cap of 12% return on
investments,” said Mendoza. TUCP will also introduce legislation to
compel the power generation corporations to divest up to 30% of their
shares to individual stakeholders to ensure greater public ownership.
“We know that aside from democratizing the ownership, spreading the
gains, it will also create a greater element of transparency in their
books and stockholders meetings and discourage ‘sweetheart deals’”,
said Mendoza.