Unmet need for family planning?
          
          
          
By 
          Fr. ROY CIMAGALA, 
          roycimagala@gmail.com
          July 16, 2012
          
          
          This is another expression coined by population controllers busy 
          working in influential institutions like the UN. They define it as 
          “percentage of currently married women aged 15-49 who want to stop 
          having children or postpone the next pregnancy for at least two years, 
          but who are not using contraception.”
          
          
          Yes, it is just as cold as that. No further distinction is made, much 
          less, any mention of moral, ethical or cultural considerations. It 
          makes the illegal and automatic equation that women who don’t want to 
          get pregnant are the same women who want or should want to have 
          contraception. That’s foul!
          
          
          In short, it is all about unmet need for contraception, whether wanted 
          or not. Thus, this concept of unmet need is a license for population 
          controllers to indiscriminately spread the virus of the contraceptive 
          mentality all over the world.
          
          
          While many countries are suffering from all sorts of economic problems 
          and many other more basic needs, population controllers just focus on 
          making contraception available or actively pushing it, branding it as 
          the panacea for poverty and other women-related problems.
          
          
          And it is the so-called rich countries (we have to qualify it that 
          way, since many of them are actually now having tremendous economic 
          problems) that want to control the population of poor but bustling 
          countries, that are financing for this unmet need. These rich 
          countries seem threatened by the poor countries.
          
          
          They say that “contraceptives are one of the best investments a 
          country can make in its future.” They still talk about the so-called 
          “demographic dividend” that illegitimately equates fewer people with 
          higher development. Everyone knows that this is not necessarily so and 
          that, in fact, the reverse can be true.
          
          
          Some reports claim that the rich and famous of the world have donated 
          $2.6 billion recently in a summit in London to meet the “unmet need” 
          of 120 million women in the developing world for family planning.
          
          
          This looks to me like a lot of moolah just going down the sinkhole, a 
          pure waste of precious resources, when there are many other more 
          important needs that require both immediate help and sustained 
          support.
          
          
          For example, Austin Ruse, the president of the Catholic Family and 
          Human Rights Institute (C-FAM), a non-profit institute that closely 
          follows the United Nations and other organizations on family and 
          population issues, claims that the real needs of women in many places 
          are still unmet: basic medical care, skilled birth attendants, 
          education, clean water, and nutrition.”
          
          
          He also claims that many countries are now facing a demographic winter 
          where there is already a notable population decline, where older 
          people are outnumbering the younger population, where deaths are 
          getting higher than births.
          
          
          He noted that even in Muslim countries that are long known to have big 
          population, a significant fertility decline is already taking place. 
          It seems they also are succumbing to the contraceptive mentality.
          
          
          Here in our country a CNN report recently observed that while many 
          other Asian countries are experiencing some economic slowdown, we are 
          having an economic surge instead.
          
          
          Economists attribute it to many factors, like a recovery of 
          electronics exports after a decline in demand last year, a strong 
          domestic consumption due to the money sent home to the Philippines by 
          its overseas workers, and the rise of outsourced call centers that 
          serve as the long-term stabilizers relatively unhindered by a sagging 
          global economy.
          
          
          According to Haz Narvaez, Manila-based head of research for the 
          Philippines at the Credit-Suisse, it is estimated that 11% of the 92 
          million Filipinos work overseas, and their remittances account for 
          about 10% of the country’s GDP, totaling $225 billion in 1991.
          
          
          Since these Filipino overseas work often as domestic workers, nurses 
          or skilled technicians or in jobs that are less vulnerable during 
          global economic slumps, they can continue working and sending money to 
          our country.
          
          
          Narvaez said, “You have an aging population in the West, and you have 
          a young population here in the Philippines waiting to do jobs that 
          some people in the West are not willing to do.” This must explain why 
          our overseas workers continue to find jobs abroad and support our 
          country significantly and rather stably.
          
          
          We should be wary when we hear some political leaders talk about the 
          RH Bill because this is pure baloney. The RH Bill has no other purpose 
          than to integrate the contraceptive mentality and the population 
          control program into our country.
          
          
          Let’s not be deceived by claims about women’s reproductive rights, 
          demographic dividends and unmet need for contraception. To me they are 
          decoys of the devil, not to mention, rotten fruits of bad thinking.