What is religious freedom?
By Fr. ROY CIMAGALA,
roycimagala@gmail.com
June 20, 2012
A kind of controversy erupted recently because a party-list
congressman had the brilliant idea of filing a bill, ironically
entitled “Religious Freedom in Government Act,” practically banning
God in public places. The premise on which the proposed bill stands
says:
“The state cannot be seen as favoring one religion over the other, in
allowing the prominent conduct and display of religious ceremonies and
symbols, respectively in public offices and property.“
And so among provisions are the following: “Religious ceremonies shall
not be undertaken within the premises and perimeter of their offices,
departments, and bureaus, including publicly owned spaces and
corridors within such spaces and corridors within such offices,
departments and bureaus.
“Religious symbols shall not be displayed within the premises and
perimeter of their offices, departments and bureaus, including
publicly owned corridors within such offices, departments, and
bureaus...”
If I may say so, this is a crazy idea simply because no one is forcing
anyone else to pray or not to pray in public places, to hold some
religious activities or not in these places. Things depend on the
religious sentiments of the people involved, whether they are in
public or private places.
What’s wrong is when you prohibit them to express their religion in
public places just because they are government properties. Religion
cannot be confined to being purely personal, individual affairs and
expressed only in private and secluded places. This is not religious
freedom at all.
One carries and lives his religion wherever he is and we should
respect this right anytime. The only limitation to this right insofar
as public places are concerned is when public disturbance is involved.
Otherwise, it should be made to be lived and expressed in the manner
desired by the persons involved.
So if more or less everyone or at least a majority agrees to pray
before starting their work in government offices, or to put some
religious images on their desks, or to have Mass on First Friday, no
law should prohibit them from doing so.
Obviously, not everyone can agree to these things, and so a certain
tolerance should be exercised by those who don’t agree, and a certain
sensitivity and magnanimity should also be practiced by the majority
toward the minority in any issue of religion.
In this regard, we have to remind the Catholics and Christians who
form the majority in our country to be delicate in living their
religion especially when practicing it would cause some unnecessary
disturbance in public.
So far, I have not witnessed any big problem in this matter in our
country. I believe we are quite a tolerant and understanding people.
We hate imposing things on others. We have managed to live in harmony
despite the great variety and differences in our religious beliefs and
practices.
On the contrary, banning the practice and expression of religion can
indicate not religious freedom but rather intolerance and tyranny. It
is forcing everyone to tend toward what are called as religious
indifference or agnosticism or relativism or atheism.
Of course, everyone is free to assume those beliefs if he chooses
them. But they should not be given some undue favorable position to
the detriment of those who choose to live their religion even in
public places.
It might be relevant to cite a point in the Catechism that talks about
religious freedom, especially in the context of a country where you
have a composition of majority and minorities in the area of religion:
“If because of the circumstances of a particular people special civil
recognition is given to one religious community in the constitutional
organization of the state, the right of all citizens and religious
communities to religious freedom must be recognized and respected as
well.” (2107)
The Catholics in general, whether they are the majority or minority in
a given country or place, abide by this teaching. This is the official
stand to which everyone is asked to live. Obviously, we need
continuing formation and reminders for this ideal to be attained.
But religious freedom is the most fundamental of all our rights and
freedoms, since it involves human freedom in its core. On it are based
all our other values pertaining to other levels and aspects of
freedom, human rights and duties.
It’s also a subject that needs to be studied and understood more
penetratingly. We should not be restrained in doing so just because we
want peace, order and harmony. We can only achieve true peace, order
and harmony when we take this task more seriously.
Otherwise, we will have false versions of religious freedom, prone to
be distorted even more.