Statement on the
Lahad Datu situation
By Philippine Center for
Islam and Democracy
February 22, 2013
On the 12th of February, 2013, news reported that 100 men, some of
them armed with a motley of rifles, belonging to the Royal Army of the
Sultanate of Sulu, landed on a remote village in Lahad Datu, Sabah,
Malaysia. Led by Rajah Mudah (Crown Prince) Agmuddin Kiram, brother of
Sultan Jamalul III, they originally stated that their purpose was
peaceful: to visit their "homeland". Later, the Rajah Mudah stated
that they are reasserting their dominion over the contested territory
to which the Philippines has a dormant historical claim, acting on a
royal decree from the Sultan, Sultan Jamalul Kiram III.
As of today, the forces of the Royal Army are engaged in an uneasy
standoff with Malaysian security forces: the former insisting on their
right to stay, and the latter demanding that the Sultan's men leave.
The Philippine government, through the Department of Foreign Affairs,
on one hand, had urged the party of the Sultan to leave peacefully. On
the other hand, the Moro National Liberation Front primarily based in
the Sulu archipelago and led by Chairman Nur Misuari, has expressed
its support of the Sultan’s Sabah claim while calling for a peaceful
resolution of the situation.
As this unanticipated event developed, there is fear that it might
negatively affect the peace process between the Philippine government
and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front, facilitated by the Malaysian
Government. The Philippine government and the MILF had signed the
Framework Agreement on the Bangsamoro (FAB) on October 15, 2012, with
the support of Malaysia. The rising tension over the situation in
Lahad Datuh needs to be resolved not just expeditiously but
peacefully. It is necessary to ensure that the standoff does not
deteriorate into violence. A violent resolution of the Lahad Datu
situation will have negative impact on the finalization of the
Philippine Government-Moro Islamic Liberation Front peace process.
Significantly, the FAB is seen by critics to have apparently left out
the MNLF and again cast aside the Sabah question. The Framework
Agreement covers a territory that includes the island provinces of
Sulu, Tawitawi and Basilan. These provinces are part of the domain of
the Sultanate of Sulu, which has historical claim over Sabah. Thus,
while there is no mention about Sabah in the FAB, there is a
Philippine claim over Sabah, which has been brought to the
International Court of Justice. Leaders of the island provinces, part
of the Sultanate of Sulu, have always maintained that the historical
claim to Sabah must be taken into consideration in the peace process.
In this light, the Philippine Center for Islam and Democracy (PCID)
strongly supports a peaceful and diplomatic resolution to the Sabah
standoff between the Royal Army of the Sultanate of Sulu and Malaysian
security forces in Lahad Datu, Sabah. The involvement of key players,
such as MNLF Chairman Nur Misuari and the Sultan of Sulu will be
instrumental in resolving this impasse. They, together with the
Malaysian and Philippine government leaders, must ensure that the
situation does not escalate into violence. All avenues must be taken
to avoid bloodshed.
The PCID also urges the Aquino administration to reactivate its
pursuit of the resolution of the Philippine claim over Sabah, which it
had filed before the International Court of Justice. A just and
peaceful resolution of the sovereign claim of the Sulu Sultanate,
erstwhile ceded to the Philippine Government, will remove a thorny
issue that has caused much uncertainty in the relationship between
Malaysia and the Philippines.
Further, the Philippine Government should protect the proprietary
rights of Sultan Jamalul Alam's heirs, identified in the 1939 ruling
of Chief Justice C.F.C. Macaskie of the High Court of North Borneo.
The heirs were Dayang-Dayang (Princess) Hadji Piandao, who was
acknowledged as the major share-holder with 3/8 share; Princess
Tarhata Kiram and Princess Sakinur-In Kiram, were to have 3/16th share
each; Mora Napsa, Sultan Esmail Kiram, Datu Punjungan, Sitti Mariam,
Sitti Jahara and Sitti Rada, who were awarded 1/24th share each.
All the principal heirs have died. The rights of their heirs, most of
whom are Filipino citizens, must be protected by the Philippine
Government.
The PCID calls on the Philippine Government to create a Sabah
Committee, under the Office of the President, to address the
Philippine Claim to Sabah. The members of the Committee should include
the Department of Foreign Affairs, Department of Justice, Department
of Local Government, Department of National Defense, Mindanao
Development Authority, Office of the Presidential Adviser on the Peace
Process, Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao, a representative of the
Sultanate of Sulu as well as a representative of the heirs to Sabah.
Past Philippine Administrations have attempted to address the Sabah
claim but were unable to reach a lasting and generally acceptable
conclusion. However, this must not discourage the stakeholders and
peace advocates from pursuing an inclusive, just and sustainable
formula that will satisfy the concerns not just of the Philippine and
Malaysian Governments but particularly of the Sulu Sultanate and the
private heirs to Sabah.
“The Believers are but a single Brotherhood: So make peace and
reconciliation between your two (contending) brothers; and fear Allah,
that ye may receive Mercy.”