Let’s be good
partisans
By
Fr. ROY CIMAGALA, roycimagala@gmail.com
March 21, 2013
Now that we are again into
exercising our duties as citizens to elect our public officials, we
need to remind ourselves to be good partisans.
To be partisan is
unavoidable among us as we try to choose our options in our effort to
organize ourselves as a people journeying in this world toward our
ultimate goal in heaven.
This is nothing to be
surprised about, and should not cause us some misplaced fear as long
as we live that aspect of our life properly.
To be partisan is a
consequence of our human condition. Since we cannot help but have
different backgrounds, preferences, views, etc., neither can we help
to avoid being partisan of what we think would serve our interests as
well as those of the others, or in fact, what would serve our common
good.
We need to be respectful
though of the different and even conflicting opinions, and just try
our best to settle or resolve our differences in ways that are fair
and charitable.
To be fair and charitable
while being partisan can mean many things. It can mean always trying
to enter into dialogue instead of imposing one’s opinions on others.
That is why we need to promote anything that can enhance dialogue. We
need to hear all sides that have something to say about a certain
issue.
It can also mean the effort
to get a consensus when a variety of options is presented. As much as
possible we have to agree to a certain device or mechanism to arrive
at a consensus. In other words, the rules of the game should be set
out and accepted by all parties as much as possible.
Underlying all this is the
attitude of charity and understanding towards others. No matter how
strong we feel about views, ours or those of others – and indeed we
can be strong in our views in certain situations – we should never
lose this attitude of charity and understanding.
To be Christian about it,
what we need to do, more than just voicing out our views and
positions, is to pray and offer sacrifices before, during and after
expressing these views and positions. We need to understand that it’s
not only reason, much less, passion, that should be mainly used in
sorting out our differences.
We have to use the
theological virtues of faith, hope and charity, because these are what
are truly proper to us in our discussions as persons and children of
God. Reason and passion without these theological virtues can get us
nowhere but spiraling tension and conflict.
We should see to it that our
mind and heart be freed of any trace of resentment, anger and the like
during and after the exchanges. We should try to avoid as much as
possible illegitimate biases and prejudices, always keeping an open
mind and the attitude of quickness to understand, disregard and
forgive whenever some mistakes are committed by the parties involved.
What should ideally happen
is that greater love and understanding is achieved after the
discussion, and even after one’s position is outvoted or defeated.
Especially when the differences are merely matters of opinion, we
should not make a big fuss as to whether who wins or who loses. We
just accept what the consensus says.
And even if the differences
are serious matters of faith and morals, we should make sure that that
such situation does not entitle us to go against the requirements of
justice and charity.
While it’s true that we can
employ certain techniques and tactics of persuasion that can also be
strong and forceful, we should see to it that we don’t depart from the
sphere of justice and charity.
In fact, whenever we have to
assume a strong position we have to make sure that we also are
stepping up our eagerness to be most fair and charitable, only using
legitimate means even if they involve inconveniences.
In this regard, we have to
realize more deeply that we need to be vitally identified with Christ.
It’s the only way we can remain truly fair and charitable amid these
sharp and painful differences.
Vital union with Christ
would teach us how to be patient, how to see things in the context of
eternity, far from a narrow and shallow view of things and from a
knee-jerk reaction to issues. It would teach us how to be merciful
even as we try to go ahead with a strong and clear vision of things
and do our best to win our case.