Greenpeace commends
Court ruling to stop field trials of Bt talong
By GREENPEACE
May 24, 2013
QUEZON CITY – Greenpeace
welcomes the ruling issued by the Court of Appeals that granted the
‘Writ of Kalikasan’ to stop the field trials of Bt eggplant. In their
decision, the court ordered the respondents to ‘permanently cease and
desist from further conducting Bt talong field trials’ and ‘protect,
preserve, rehabilitate and restore the environment in accordance with
the foregoing judgement of the court.’
“We commend the Court of
Appeals for living up to its constitutionally-mandated role as
protector of constitutional rights,” said Daniel Ocampo, Greenpeace
Southeast Asia Sustainable Agriculture Campaigner. “This landmark
decision reflects that there are indeed flaws and lapses in the
current regulatory process for Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs)
such as Bt eggplant which exposes our environment and health to
unknown long-term consequences and does not establish their safety in
any way,” stressed Ocampo.
The Writ of Kalikasan is a
legal remedy under the new rules of procedure for environmental cases.
The 25-page decision highlighted that the decision was based on
submissions from both the respondents and the petitioners. After more
than a year of court deliberations, the Court of Appeals ruled in the
favour of petitioners on the following compelling grounds:
1. The Precautionary
Principle safeguards the environment from technologies that will have
far reaching impacts when their long-term safety is still not
ascertained;
2. The issue of
irreversibility of releasing GMOs into the environment even during
field trials and despite alleged compliance to existing protocols;
3. Vetting protocols should
not be confined within the realm of science but should be brought into
the realm of public policy since other sectors beyond the agricultural
sector could stand to be affected as propounded by Dr. Ben Malayang,
former member of the National Committee on Biosafety of the
Philippines; and
4. Current field testing
protocols looks at efficacy and agricultural performance and not
safety for human consumption or environment.
Atty. Zelda DT Soriano,
Greenpeace Southeast Asia Regional Political Advisor, pointed out,
“the respondents could not prove wrong the fact that Bt talong field
testing is an environmental case where scientific evidence as to the
health, environmental and socio-economic safety is insufficient,
inconclusive or uncertain and preliminary evaluation indicates that
there are reasonable grounds for concern that there are potentially
dangerous effects on the environment and human health.”
Atty. Soriano explains that
for the same scientific uncertainties and health concerns the
governments of India, China, Thailand, Austria, France, Hungary,
Poland, Germany, Luxembourg, Greece, Bulgaria, Ireland, Peru, Kenya,
Tasmania, Australia, Egypt, Algeria, Angola, Benin, Malawi, Namibia,
Zambia, Switzerland, Russia and Mexico banned the release of
genetically modified crops into their environments and/or the
importation for food and processing.
Ocampo added that the
decision made by the Court of Appeals will have a resounding impact on
the future of agriculture in the Philippines and how food production
is done in our country. Ocampo argued that the court’s decision
affirms what Greenpeace has been saying for years about the flaws on GMO regulations in the country.
“These flaws in the
government regulations have led to the sad state we are in – 62 GMOS
are imported and fed to Filipinos without their knowledge and consent.
While the environment and our farmers are exposed to 8 kinds of GMOs
that are allowed for propagation without knowing their long-term
impacts,” stressed Ocampo.