New Greenpeace
report says coal to stifle Philippine economic growth
Aquino government urged to
drop plans for coal energy expansion
By GREENPEACE
May 7, 2014
MAKATI CITY, Philippines – A
new Greenpeace report outlined how the Philippines stands to lose
billions in economic revenue and incur even more unforeseen human and
environmental costs if the Aquino government continues to promote
dirty coal energy even in this age of accelerated climate change.
Greenpeace’s True Cost of
Coal Volume 1 is an overview of how coal has forever disadvantaged the
Philippines in terms of environmental and health impacts, damages to
agriculture and marine life and more. The report also exposed how
government officials and key players in the Energy sector continue to
mislead the public claiming how coal investments will propel the
nation to a more energy secure future, when in fact worldwide, coal is
destroying lands and livelihood and endangering people’s health and
well-being in the name of development.
“Our leaders have always
envisioned a green and prosperous Philippines and yet, by promoting
dirty coal projects, they are burning our chances of a more
sustainable economic development. What’s more, they are asking
Filipinos to pay dearly for a future marked by more deadly and extreme
weather events aggravated by the burning of fossil fuels like coal,”
said Reuben Andrew Muni, Climate and Energy Campaigner for Greenpeace
Philippines. “This report should make President Aquino and his energy
officials to re-think about approving more coal-fired plants, aside
from the 45 plants currently in the pipeline.”
Coal is a highly polluting
energy source and emits much more carbon per unit of energy than oil
and natural gas. From mine to sky, from extraction to combustion, coal
pollutes every step of the way. The huge environmental and social
costs associated with coal usage make it an expensive option for
developing countries. More importantly, coal promoters continually
overlook the increasingly urgent need to curtail fossil fuels use due
to climate change.
The first of three parts,
True Cost of Coal Volume 1 focused on the external costs of coal
energy production in the Philippines – from mining to importation.
Research has shown that coal is not as cheap as its promoters have
claimed it to be.
A typical new 600-MW coal
plant has price tag of roughly USD 2 billion. Furthermore, the
Philippines is hostage to international fossil fuel markets for the
cost of fuel which can be up to 70% of the total generation cost
passed on to the consumers by the government and the power utilities
sector.
Another point to consider is
the fact that more than 34% of the Philippine’s power generation comes
from imported coal from Indonesia. This demand for coal locks the
country into a problematic paradigm, where it relies on a resource
(coal) that it cannot produce domestically and must therefore import.
“By constantly spending
money to acquire foreign coal, the Philippines is unnecessarily
squandering its foreign currency, sending it abroad, which negatively
affects its balance of trade, as well as its energy independence, said
Amalie Obusan, Regional Climate and Energy Campaigner for Greenpeace
Southeast Asia. “Compare this with Renewable Energy which is clean and
naturally abundant in the Philippines. While the price of coal rises,
the price of wind and sun doesn’t change, it is always free.”
According to the Department
of Energy, geothermal energy alone has already had a massive impact on
foreign exchange over time, through displacement of imported fuels.
The Philippines has in fact saved about USD 7,074,870,000 billion
since 1997.
The Greenpeace report also
gave key insights on how coal powered plants operating in the country
have endangered coal-affected communities and the natural environment
[3]. Laws and other policy instruments that were blatantly disregarded
both by coal companies and the government were also made known in the
report.
Greenpeace laments the
Aquino government’s clear bias for coal and its mere token of support
for RE. While there is a slow push for the implementation of the
Renewable Energy Act of 2008, the DOE is swift to defend and promote
coal as the primary source of electricity in the country.
“Coal is not cheap and the
human and environmental costs of dirty energy are just too high to
ignore. We cannot allow the status quo to continue,” added Muni. “The
goal of inclusive economic growth need not be in sharp contradiction
with the goal of environmental protection and conservation. Clean and
renewable energy is possible. We must use it to our advantage and end
the age of coal.”