Greenpeace urges
scientific community to amplify support for climate resilient
agriculture
By
GREENPEACE
October 31, 2014
MANILA – Greenpeace
today called on the scientific community to step up its support for
ecological food production to build resilient agriculture that can
meet the threat posed by climate change and ensure food diversity and
nutrition security. The call was made on the final day of the 4th
International Rice Congress (IRC) held this week.
Highlighting the role of
non-genetically modified plant breeding technologies in producing new
rice strains that can adapt to extreme and changing climate
conditions, Dr. Janet Cotter, Senior Scientist at Greenpeace
International’s Science Unit said:
“The International Rice
Congress, a regular scientific meeting that gathers rice industry
players, is tremendously important for the future of rice. It’s
amazing to see so many rice traits, such as drought-tolerant and
increased yield varieties, being developed through marker-assisted
conventional breeding. What’s needed now is to put these traits into
varieties suitable for low-input, ecological agriculture to ensure the
sustainability of rice farming, and to increase its resilience to
climate change.”
Cotter said that in times of
extreme weather events like droughts, floods, and typhoons,
communities need resilient agriculture that will continue to provide
food and meet their nutritional needs.
It remains difficult,
however, to predict when droughts or floods will occur and while plant
breeding can provide climate tolerant varieties, farmers do not always
know which variety to plant. “Diversity holds the key to climate
change resilient farming by providing an insurance policy against the
impacts of extreme weather,” Cotter added.
In Thailand, the debate on
genetically modified organisms (GMOs) was sparked again on October 21,
just a few days prior to the IRC, when the country’s Supreme
Administrative Court dismissed a case filed by Greenpeace against the
Department of Agriculture for negligence in the management of the
department’s genetically engineered papaya field trials in Khon Kaen
province in 2004.
While in the Philippines,
there is growing resistance among local scientists, farmers and
consumers on GMOs like ‘Golden’ Rice, created and marketed to
developing countries like the Philippines as a quick-fix solution to
eradicate Vitamin A Deficiency (VAD) among children and solve world
hunger. Despite the hype and decades of research and development,
there is still no scientific proof that ‘Golden’ Rice will indeed
solve VAD.
Kasarian-Kalayaan, Inc. (Sarilaya),
an NGO working with women farmers, is strongly against GMOs such as
‘Golden’ Rice because they encroach upon peoples’ rights to healthy
food and a healthy environment.
GMOs will only worsen, not
solve the country’s food and nutrition issues. “We, at Sarilaya is for
the promotion of sustainable production and consumption. We want to
ensure that the next generation will live in an environment that is
healthy and safe, giving importance to environmental stewardship,”
said Margie Lacanilao of Sarilaya.
“Solutions to food
insecurity and nutritional deficiencies are already available;
including the fortification of food, Vitamin A supplementation, and
diet diversification sourced from ecological agriculture. These
solutions should be supported through policies that will enable
farmers and the industry to pursue ecological agriculture instead of
the illusion of GMOs, which will only divert resources away from
solutions already available,” said Daniel Ocampo, Greenpeace
Philippines Ecological Agriculture Campaigner. “Aside from resilience
to climate change, ecological agriculture ensures ecological diversity
and can be a source of diverse diets that assures a healthier source
of nutrients for people,” Ocampo added.
Despite the interests of
some industry members in producing new genetically engineered rice
strains, Marker Assisted Selection (MAS) is by far ahead of any
genetically engineered rice being developed. Several rice varieties
developed through MAS are already helping farmers cope with abiotic
stresses such as drought and salinity.
Unlike genetic engineering,
crops produced through MAS do not present risks to farmers or traders
resulting from GMO contamination.