Fisherfolk say
Aquino’s revised Fisheries Code is invalid and undemocratic
Press Release
September 16, 2014
MANILA – Around 100
fishermen from the Save the Fisheries Now Network (SFNN) trooped to
the Makati Business District to deliver a letter to the European Union
(EU) Delegation, citing complaints against the Aquino government for
hastily amending the Philippine Fisheries Code (RA 8550), which the
president will be presenting to the EU Council in Brussels, Belgium
later today. The group said that the Fisheries Code was quickly
revised without due process, after the Philippines received a “yellow
card” sanction from the EU over the country’s failure to combat
Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing (IUUF).
"Fisherfolk, who already
feel disadvantaged, also feel discriminated against by our own
government for not informing us in the first place that the country
got sanctioned by the EU. The yellow card sanction, plus the new
amendments have a direct impact on fishermen who rely solely on
fishing,” said Pablo Rosales, National Chairperson of Pangisda
Pilipinas. “No consultations at the national scale were initiated. As
stakeholders, municipal fishermen should have been informed and
consulted.”
The sense of frustration
among small-scale fisherfolk left them no alternative but to send a
distress call to the EU Delegation in Manila. SFNN sent a letter to
the EU Ambassador Guy Ledoux in Manila, since part of President
Aquino’s agenda in Europe is to assure the European Community that
drastic measures are now being taken to deter IUUF.
Illegal, Unreported and
Unregulated Fishing has long been the scourge of Philippines seas and
remains a big threat to small-scale fishermen who easily lose their
fish catch to large commercial fleets that encroach on municipal
waters. SFNN is deeply concerned that trade-related incentives,
concerning tuna imports bound for the European markets, were
government’s only consideration for complying with EU regulations.
"We’ve long asked help from
the government to combat IUUF but it seems they will do whatever it
takes to continue ‘unlimited fishing’, even step on the rights of
marginalized fisherfolk, just to satisfy the greed of large tuna
companies," said Ruperto Aleroza, spokesperson of the Pambansang
Katipunan ng Samahan sa Kanayunan (PKSK).
Save the Fisheries Now
Network said that the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR)
convened a meeting in August, mostly attended by the commercial sector
and non-government organizations, but with hardly any representatives
from small-scale fisheries. SFNN questioned BFAR’s lack of
transparency and accountability, arguing that the government should
have given all stakeholders enough time to study and even propose
provisions that should have been included in the Fisheries Code
amendment. While the group agreed to the high penalties to be imposed
on violators, the lack of consultation makes the amendment process
undemocratic and discriminatory.
“It took the entire
fisheries sector several years to craft the original Fisheries Code,
which was already weak in many ways. So how can the government make
amendments, within just two months, and hope it will be encompassing
and strong enough to meet EU compliance,” asked Dennis Calvan,
Executive Director of NGOs for Fisheries Reform. “The EU should not
even accept President Aquino’s new proposal because it is not
constitutional and does not reflect the sentiments of Filipino
fishermen.”