Chiz questions big
budget to monitor BUB projects
By Office of Senator Chiz
Escudero
September 24, 2014
PASAY CITY – While
hailing the bottom-up budget (BUB) as an excellent template in
enlarging the share of local government units in the national budget,
Senator Chiz Escudero, however, said it should be rid of expensive
riders that can be utilized to cover more towns or projects.
Escudero, who chairs of the
Senate Committee on Finance, said that P840 million has been proposed
in the 2015 national budget for the “monitoring and evaluation” of BuB
projects.
The amount, Escudero
explained, is on top of the P20.9 billion for a menu of projects
ranging from classrooms to clinics, which were identified by local
governments through a process involving citizens’ consultation, and
brings real allocation for the BUB to P21.7 billion.
“Kung monitoring lang, ang
P840 million ay masyado yatang malaki. Katumbas na ng budget ng 30
district hospitals. It's an expensive rider,” Escudero pointed out.
“I think, at the very least,
we should reduce the monitoring budget. Then we add whatever amount
slashed to the budget of the BuB proper. That way we can cover more
towns or increase the funding for those already in,” he added.
According to Escudero,
Aquino administration’s BuB project, which was introduced in 2013, can
be implemented without creating a monitoring industry.
Piloted last year, BuB has
been officially renamed Grassroots Participatory Budgeting Process (GPBP)
in the 2015 proposed spending plan. Under the program, funding for
projects chosen by local government units (LGUs) is incorporated in
the budgets of 11 participating national agencies. There is also a
separate budget for monitoring.
In today’s budget hearing of
the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG), Escudero
asked department officials on the particulars of its total BuB fund
amounting to P5.7 billion.
DILG Sec. Mar Roxas said
their BuB is spent on monitoring and evaluation and other activities
pertaining to projects in all 1,600 LGUs across the country. Escudero
asked the secretary to submit to the committee the detailed breakdown.
Among the participating
agencies with GPBP allocations are
Department of Tourism (DoT), P348
million; Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD), P2.717
billion; Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), P641 million;
Department of Agriculture (DA), P4.28 billion; Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), P323. 5 million.
Department
of Education (DepEd), P1.49 billion; Department of Energy (DoE), P84.6
million; Department of Health (DoH), P1.47 billion; Department of
Labor and Employment (DoLE), P444.2 million; and Technical Education
and Skills Development Authority (TESDA), P296 million.
To monitor and evaluate the
projects which will be implemented in partnership with LGUs,
“monitoring and evaluation” expenses are proposed for the following:
DILG,
P451 million; DepEd, P44.8 million; DA, P113.3 million; DOE, P2.5
million; DoH, P44.1 million; DoLE, P13.3 million; TESDA, P8.9 million;
DoT, P10.4 million; DSWD, P81.5 million; and DTI,18.4 million.
To illustrate how funding
for “monitoring and evaluation” of projects under BuB could be spent
to finance other programs, Escudero said the P44.8 million set aside
for DepEd could buy 64,000 classroom chairs, while the P81 million
proposed for DSWD could cover the expenses of the agency’s Balik
Probinsya Program for some 5,000 families.
“If you look at the DOH
budget, there is no distinctly identified budget for monitoring one
disease. There’s no funding to track dengue, for example. Kulang ang
‘health sentinel’ funding support, but sa BuB merong P44 million,” he
said.
Cutting GPBP's monitoring
budget by half will free up P400 million and "if we later disperse
this to 800 poor towns at P500,000 each, it can do a lot of good at
the grassroots,” Escudero said.