CSOs unite to fight Bt talong, calls the supreme court to issue TEPO
and continuing mandamus
Press Release
June 14, 2012
QUEZON CITY – Farmers, scientist, doctors, lay leaders, members of
the academe and consumers today unite to fight the Bt talong field
testing, and calls the Supreme Court to protect the constitutional
rights of the people. Members of Magsasaka at Siyentipiko para sa
Pag-Unlad ng Agrikultura (MASIPAG), Sibol ng Agham at Teknolohiya (SIBAT),
Consumer Rights for Safe Food (CRSF), Philippine Misereor Partnership
Inc (PMPI), PILIPINA, SEARICE, MIRIAM Peace, Lingkod Tao Kalikasan (LTK)
and SARILAYA joins the petitioners call for the Supreme Court to
immediately issue the Temporary Environmental Protection Order (TEPO)
to stop the Bt eggplant field trials.
Bt talong is an eggplant genetically modified to produce a toxin to
combat the Fruit and Shoot Borer (FSB). Bt stands for Bacillus
thuringiensis, a soil bacteria whose genes are inserted to the
eggplant to produce toxins against FSB. Bt talong, which was
originally from India, is now being tested in different sites across
the Philippines for planned commercialization this year. In India
however, the Minister on Environment and Forests Jairam Ramesh order a
moratorium on the commercialization of Bt Brinjal (Indian term for
eggplant) due to concerns on health, environment and control of
agrochem giant Monsanto in their food systems. The Bt brinjal
developer Mahyco is a local subsidiary of Monsanto.
“We praise the Supreme Court for acting swiftly on the petition of the
people to stop the Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) eggplant field testing.
Through the issuance of the Writ of Kalikasan, it has temporarily
stopped the new application of permits to field test Bt talong. We
praise the court for its decision to protect the Filipino people’s
constitutional right to health and to a balanced and healthful
ecology” said Dr Chito Medina, national Coordinator of farmer-scientis
group MASIPAG.
The Writ of Kalikasan (writ of nature) is a legal remedy for
environmental cases to protect and advance the constitutional right of
the people to a balanced and healthful ecology. Recently, petitioners
sought for a Writ of Kalikasan against the field testing of the Bt
eggplant, which the Supreme Court en banc granted. The petitioners
include former Senator Orlando Mercado, Puerto Princesa Mayor Edward
S. Hagedorn, Rep. Teodoro Casiño, Dr. Charito Medina of Magsasaka at
Siyentipiko sa Pagpapaunlad ng Agrikultura (MASIPAG), lawyers Harry
Roque and Maria Paz Luna, scientists Dr. Ben Malayang III of Silliman
University and Dr. Romeo Quijano of University of the Philippines (UP)
Manila, Catherine Untalan of Miss Earth Foundation, Leo Avila,
representing the City Government of Davao, and activist-musician Noel
Cabangon.
The group however is still very much concerned, as the Supreme Court
has yet to issue a writ of continuing mandamus and Temporary
Environemntal Protection Order (TEPO), while field testing of Bt
talong still continues. “We firmly believe that if the multi-location
trials of the genetically modified (GM) eggplants persist, they will
pose serious threats not only to the farmers, but also to the
consumers’ health and the environment as well” added Medina.
SIBAT whose work focuses on developing groundbreaking technologies
using science and technology that are appopriate for community
development, sees that if the multi-location field trial of Bt talong
continue, this will affect organic farmers due to possible
contamination of native eggplant varieties. “Studies show that
cross-pollination among eggplants is high, where insects acting as
pollinators could travel a reasonable distance. The inevitable
occurrence of contamination could greatly affect the rich biodiversity
of eggplants and related varieties in the Philippines. Contamination
of the non-GM plants would undermine not only the farmers’ freedom of
choice in seeds and technology, but the consumers’ right to
information and freedom of choice as well. Also, GMOs is inconsistent
with the Organic Agriculture Law that excludes the use of such
products” said Shen Maglinte of SIBAT.
CRSF is a network of advocates who aims to build a pro-active and
empowered network of consumers and producers working, coordinating and
cooperating towards the availability and affordability of safe and
nutritious food. Grace Chua of CRSF said that genetically modified
produce which contains a gene of a foreign species such as that of a
bacteria is not equivalent to natural crops and therefore needs
extensive tests for its safety for human consumption and environmental
impact. “International studies have shown that GM products have
adverse effects on the digestive, respiratory and reproductive systems
of laboratory animals. If Bt talong will be commercialized, it will
greatly threaten the health and safety of the Filipino consumers. We
believe that consumers should have the right to choose to be free from
consuming Genetically Modified Organisms but is not given this right
because of the lack of proper labeling laws” said Chua.
Philippine Misereor Partnership, Inc said that they are very much
concerned with the recent developments on agriculture in the country.
According to Yolly Esguerra, PMPI secretariat that “the government has
the obligation to provide a balanced information on any technology
that could potentially harm so as the people can have an informed
opinion on the issue. However, government agencies and their
scientists harp on the supposed benefits and advantages of Bt talong
and continue to downplay new data and information presented by
independent scientists, experts and institutions on the possible
dangers of Bt talong.”
In India, the Ministry of Forestry and Environment imposed a
moratorium on the release of Bteggplant, citing its impacts not only
on food safety and security, but also on the Indian peoples’ culture.
Considered to be the world’s center of biodiversity of eggplant
varieties, the crop plays a tremendous role in the everyday life of
Indian peoples. In the Philippines however, there were no known
studies made by regulators such as the National Committee on Biosafety
or the Bureau of Plant Industry on the effects of Bt eggplant on human
health and the Environment.
“The Indian government chose to uphold the welfare and interests of
its people after extensive consultations across the nation. But here,
the Bt talong field testing commenced even without proper consultation
and information to the community. This has prompted Brgy Pangasugan of
Baybay, Leyte, Sta Barbara of Iloilo and the City of Davao to stop the
field test in their areas. In Davao, the Bt talong field test was
ordered to be uprooted because of lack of consultation” added Basilio
Prado, a MASIPAG farmer based in Nueva Vizcaya.
Prado added that there are many options to control the fruit-and-shoot
borer which is safer and less expensive. “Bt talong is just a ploy to
further commercialize agriculture and take away the rights of the
farmers to seed sharing and appropriate, safe technologies. It is
puzzling why the proponents has been focusing on Bt talong, whereas in
India a moratorium on the commercialization was passed by the Minister
of Environment of Forestry and Environment as they are also cautious
on the damages that Bt eggplant may cause” added Prado.
“We therefore implore the Supreme Court to likewise protect the
Filipino people against a possibly harmful technology. We urge the
honorable justices to immediately halt the field tests until the
proponents can present objective and empirical data that could satisfy
the multitude of farmers and consumers. And until there is no
independent and scientific study on the safety, environmental
sustainability and socio-economic impacts that is both acceptable to
the public and the proponents, we urge the Supreme Court to issue the
proper orders to cancel all the field tests, and revoke all the
permits related to the said project. There are better alternatives and
agricultural systems that will ensure better incomes for the farmers,
safe food for the consumers and protection to the environment.
Finally, we pray that the Supreme Court to uphold Republic Act 10068
to ensure the protection of the farmers and the consumers as well”
added Medina.