Chief Justice’s credibility crossroad
          
          
          
By CHITO DELA TORRE
          May 25, 
          2012
          
          
          Many are either worried or excited just about how the impeachment of 
          Philippine chief justice Renato C. Corona will turn out within this 
          incoming week at which the Senate Impeachment Court is resolved to 
          make its final judgment, final decision, or final verdict.  Some, 
          though, are no longer interested to know the results. For few others, 
          they have already made their own verdict.  The most worrisome of the 
          predicted results is a verdict of acquittal.  As of this writing, 
          though, there’s no clear official and final position taken by the 
          senator-judges.  The nation cannot even conjecture what the uncertain 
          “6 senator-judges”, who are thought of to be hiding under their togas 
          the so-called “sway votes”, will take at the end of the day.  To many 
          observers, the upcoming senatorial elections (though yet on May 13, 
          2013) serve as a barometer watched on by these “uncertain” judges.
          
          
          Let me share with you here some of the reactions to my propositions in 
          this column last Thursday (May 24) which referred much to the infamous 
          discourteous walkout of Corona from his impeachment trial sans leave 
          of court (QN: ‘I will join the NPA, if Corona’s May 22 statements will 
          be believed by the SIC’).
          
          
          KellyGuy emailed me his honest thoughts:
          
          
          “I had been avidly watching the impeachment proceedings. (For many of 
          the 41 sessions) To be honest... I also noted that Senator Enrile was 
          more than lenient (i.e allowed court rules to be ignored) with Supreme 
          Court Justice C. J. Corona.  Having said that, being the highest 
          ranking Judge in the country, CJ made a mockery of the Court while 
          vehemently thumbing his nose at not only Enrile, the attending Judge 
          Senators but, the entire Impeachment process.  He should have known 
          that he was only there to testify on articles 2.2 and 2.3 of initial 
          charges.  His long dissertation about his meager lifestyle and how he 
          constantly sacrificed to save money was the reason he was able to 
          afford multiple properties, just did not pass the common sensibility 
          test.  By doing so, he degenerated his own personal integrity and 
          credibility.  I could go on about his conduct and testimony but it 
          would be pointless.  His actions on the stand and subsequently 
          excusing himself / exiting without being discharged from the 
          impeachment proceedings has vividly demonstrated that he (CJ) does not 
          support the justice system he was tasked to lead.  His gross 
          misconduct during and after his testimony should be grounds for 
          immediate removal from his appointed position as THE Supreme Court 
          Head Justice.  Even if the release of any and all SALN supporting 
          documents could somehow prove his innocence, his conduct was such that 
          he should not be permitted to continue as THE Supreme Court Justice.  
          The misconduct was so grave that his eligibility for retirement should 
          also be revoked.  {His attempt at acting...to cover his gross error in 
          judgement by walking out failed miserably!   Hopefully the Philippine 
          movie industry does not attempt to make him the lead actor in ANY 
          movie.} Additionally... if you’re ill... you show very visible body 
          language signs of an illness.  The only illness I saw was a minor 
          stress that he experienced which arose from his very own personal 
          failure.  The please sign with me the waiver / release of SALN and 
          supporting documents was just one more demonstration of extreme 
          incompetence.  Even a Freshman Congress person knows that any waiver 
          can only be signed by the SOLE person wishing to release that 
          information.
          
          
          “I could continue to mention all of the things CJ Corona did WRONG 
          but, why waste my precious time!??  The man proved his incompetence 
          live on TV for all to see. The bottom line... CJ is not fit to be a 
          Judge, Atty., Brgy. Chair or a mere Brgy. Tanod.  The sooner he is 
          removed for incompetence the better for all of us.  I seem to recall 
          that one of our SC Justices was removed for seeing dwarfs... CJ Corona 
          has reached the same credibility crossroad.  Let us hope that wiser 
          people come to the same conclusion and no only accept his resignation 
          but, ensure that he does not qualify for a retirement.”
          
          
          Others may even have been thinking ahead of my propositions.
          
          
          Francis, a highly respectable government servant, chimed in, thus: 
          “Idol Chito: I'm with you on this...count on me if you organize a 
          group. I enjoyed reading your article. MABUHAY KA!”
          
          
          Pastor Guil Gacutan, meanwhile, sent in this message: “God’s word for 
          today, Matthew 24:35: Christ says, Heaven and Earth shall pass away 
          but my words shall never pass away.  Yes, this universe and the 
          planets (the second heaven) will come to an end.”  Guil has reminded 
          QN readers and my FaceBook followers in another message: “The purpose 
          of our lives is not just to establish a temporal relationship here on 
          earth but everlasting relationship with the Almighty God in heaven 
          through genuine faith in Christ”.
          
          
          May God bless us all today and always.  May God enlighten the chief 
          justice, the associate justices, the administrator and all other 
          officials and employees of the Philippine Supreme Court, and all those 
          who insist in glorifying and exalting sinful top government 
          officials.  Say, “Amen, Amen!”
          
          
          
          + + + + + + + + + + 
          
          
          Kudos to PNP! – Congratulations to the joint elements of Samar Police 
          Provincial Office and Gandara (Samar) Police Station for successfully 
          collaring last May 18 at past 9 a.m. the top number 29 in the list of 
          most wanted persons in Eastern Visayas (Region 8).  Arrested was Noli 
          Mabahin Fornillos, 29, of barrio Pasigay, Calbiga, Samar.  He was 
          arrested at Lot 21, Block 13, Village Park, Barangay Langkaan 1, 
          Dasmarińas City, Cavite.  He carried a P90,000 reward on his head. The 
          nabbing officers were led by police chief inspector Marben Manaog 
          Ordonia and Gandara, Samar town police inspector Fritz Bioco Blanco of 
          Gandara police station under the direct supervision of police senior 
          superintendent Eusebio Adamero Mejos.  The arrest was in pursuance of 
          an arrest warrant issued by regional trial court (branch 33, in 
          Calbiga, Samar) judge Carmencita Cuares.  Fornillos was eventually 
          detained at Samar PPO.
          
          
          Just a by the way, what happened to the reward?  Did the arresting 
          policemen get it? The Filipino public of this republican government 
          deserves to know.
          
          
          + + + + + + + + + + 
          
          
          “The Marxist philosophy of dialectical materialism has two outstanding 
          characteristics. One is its class nature: it openly avows that 
          dialectical materialism is in the service of the proletariat. The 
          other is its practicality: it emphasizes the dependence of theory on 
          practice, emphasizes that theory is based on practice and in turn 
          serves practice. The truth of any knowledge or theory is determined 
          not by subjective feelings, but by objective results in social 
          practice. Only social practice can be the criterion of truth. The 
          standpoint of practice is the primary and basic standpoint in the 
          dialectical materialist theory of knowledge.” – Mao Tse Tung (Note: 
          ‘See Karl Marx, "Theses on Feuerbach". Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, 
          Selected Works, in two volumes, Eng. ed., FLPH, Moscow, 1958, Vol., 
          Vol. II, p. 403, and V. I. Lenin, Materialism and Empirio-Criticism, 
          ring. ed., FLPH, Moscow, 1952, pp. 136-4.’)