Two sets of jewels
By JUAN L. MERCADO,
juan_mercado77@yahoo.com
September 14, 2012
“Better to have second-hand
diamonds than none at all,” Mark Twain once joked. On the 40th
anniversary of martial law, Rep. Imelda Marcos wails about stolen
diamonds and jewelry.
No, no, no. Imelda did not
say she stashed stolen gems. “The Presidential Commission on Good
Government stole my jewels,” she claims. “They should return them,
instead of displaying them” (at National Museum). They were already
mine before Ferdinand became president”.
“Jewels take people’s mind
off their wrinkles.” Now pushing 83, Imelda gripes she has only paste
gems left. She paraded the bogus trinkets before reporters.
“I have no expertise on
jewelry”, President Benigno Aquino shrugged. After the museum road
show, PCGG proposed the jewels be auctioned. “I just want to ensure
all will be disposed off properly, and every centavo go to
government.”
The exhibit-cum-auction
proposal caromed into 2012 martial law rites that goes beyond routine
slamming of the lady’s 1,080 shoes. “There’s a little Imelda in all of
us”, reads a New York shoe store poster.
So, “where are all those
shoes?” asks Virginia Moncrieff in Huffington Post. “Mrs Marcos wants
them returned… even if they don’t qualify as vintage kisch”, Moncrieff
adds. She edged out other Third World dictators in a Newsweek list.
“No mean feat for the woman with expensive feet… But Imelda continues
to fight for what she says is rightfully hers – the loot acquired from
her husband's 21 years of pillaging the Philippines”.
The storm, this year, swirls
around three batches of gems: (a) the Malacañang Collection; (b) the
“Honolulu Batch and (c) the Roumeliotes Set”.
People Power demonstrators
stumbled across 300 gems in deserted Malacañang closets, hours after
the Marcoses scrambled aboard Chinook escape helicopters.
In Honolulu, 25 US customs
officers took five hours to inspect Marcos luggage which arrived a
C-141 cargo jet, recalls “Chronology of the Marcos Plunder.” The
Marcoses were allowed keep what they declared: bearer bonds, cash etc.
But US customs didn’t look the other way with 278 crates of art, P27.7
million in newly minted currency, plus 400 jewels stashed among gold
bars, wrapped in diaper bags.
Philippine authorities
nailed Greek national Demetriou Roumeliotes when smuggling out 60
gems, two weeks after the Marcoses flight. A 37 carat diamond, crafted
by Bulgari, is centerpiece.
Imelda’s fight to get “her”
jewels back continues of what “Arab News” reported in September 2005:
“(She) asked a local court to stop government from selling the
‘Roumeliotes Collection’, as experts from auction house Christie’s
arrived in Manila to inspect the gems.
“They were inside a package
addressed to Imelda Marcos when seized. Roumeliotes denied she owned
them and later said they were fakes – a claim both Sotheby’s and
Christie’s refuted.
“The jewelry was taken out
of Malacañang presidential palace without knowledge, much less the
consent, of the petitioner between Feb. 26 and Feb. 27, 1986,” her
petition said. “These are all mine,” she stressed.
Mrs. Marcos abandoned claims
to the “Honolulu Batch’, Arab News reported. She signed an agreement,
with the US government in 1991, giving the jewels to the Philippines.
In exchange, two racketeering cases against her in Honolulu were
dropped.
“What does it profit a man
if he gains the whole world?”, you ask. “It took almost 14 years for
the Filipino people to dislodge the Marcoses,” Inquirer’s Randy David
writes. Members of his family are back in power. No one has been
jailed… Bulk of the money stolen from has not been recovered. This is
not just failed memory. This is the result of a flawed social system
that remains vulnerable to temptations of authoritarianism.”
The controversy reminds many
of “Jewels of the Pauper”, written in 1942, by a 25-year old Jesuit
scholastic, imprisoned with 460 others, by the Japanese, in what was
Ateneo de Manila on Padre Faura. Horacio de la Costa later became a
historian and first Filipino to head the Jesuit province in the
Philippines. He wrote a thee-minute piece that enabled change of sets
for a program to uplift the starving depressed co-prisoners.
Excerpts:”
“We are a remarkably poor
people. Poor even in the riches of the spirit. No Shakespeare, no
Cervantes has yet been born, among us to touch with immortality, that
which in our landscape, customs, history, is most memorable, most
ourselves.
“Yet, this pauper hides two
jewels in her rags. One is our music. We are sundered by 87 dialects.
We are one people when we sing. In the north, a peasant woman croons
her child to sleep; and the Visayan, listening, remembers cane fields
of his childhood, and his mother singing the self-same song.
“We are one people when we
pray. Our other treasure, faith, gives to our uneventful days, a
splendor; as though touched by a King. Our religion and our music
(blend) like basic rites of human life. Harvest, seed-time, wedding,
birth and death are, among us, drenched with the fragrance of incense
and coolness of music.
“These are the bonds that
bind us together; these are the soul that makes us one…“This nation
may be conquered, trampled upon, enslaved, but it cannot perish. Like
the sun that dies every evening, it will rise again from the dead.”
Two kinds of jewels. Two
unbridgeable worlds? P-noy better auction those gems soonest. His term
is limited. A successor less principled may agree with what Imelda
says: “If you know how much you've got, you probably haven't got
much“.