"Wheel of torture”
symbolizes culture of torture impunity in the Philippines
A Statement from United
Against Torture Coalition (UATC)-Philippines forwarded by the Asian
Human Rights Commission
February 4, 2014
The existence of “wheel of
torture” game at a Philippine National Police (PNP) detention facility
in Biñan, Laguna where detainees are reportedly tortured by
authorities and its discovery by the Commission on Human Rights of the
Philippines (CHRP) last week only shows of what it seems everywhere
before you is a sight of impunity.
The United Against Torture
Coalition (UATC)-Philippines, while noting the action by the CHRP in
its inspection of the PNP lock-up cell in Laguna, is deeply concerned
on the existence of such detention facility which only confirms the
consistent and on-going allegations of routine and widespread use of
torture and ill-treatment of suspects in police custody.
In light of this situation,
the government and even the CHRP seemed to have overlooked one thing:
zero-tolerance of torture and full implementation of the Anti-Torture
Law. More importantly, the discovery of the secret detention facility
has further set the stage of existing culture of torture impunity in
the Philippines.
The UATC-Philippines
stressed that this lamentable situation reinforces the need for a more
systematic and diligent implementation of the Anti-Torture Law to
ensure perpetrators are brought to justice, that torture survivors
receive medical and legal services and other forms of redress, and
that the authorities and the public are made aware of such practices
in order to ensure zero-tolerance of torture.
When all we have to go by to
measure the effects of authorities’ periodic boasting of
“zero-tolerance” of torture and other forms of human rights
violations, one must be doubtful about this message when one considers
the existence of “wheel of torture” and secret detention facility.
Likewise, one wonders in light of this if the policy of “zero
tolerance” is just all for show to draw away the attention of the
public and international community of the government’s failure to
eliminate torture in the country.
The existence of secret
detention facility indicates the government’s reluctance to ensure
full implementation of the Anti-Torture Law. In this case, the CHRP
should carry out random inspection of police station lock-up cells and
conduct unannounced inspection of all detention facilities as mandated
by law and ensure implementation of the PNP Memorandum-Directive of 4
November 2008 concerning inspection of lock-cells.
The UATC-Philippines
emphasized that “suspension and dismissal of from service of the 10
suspected torturers are not enough. Cases should be filed against the
alleged perpetrators under the Anti-Torture Law and prosecute
perpetrators.”
The adoption of the
Anti-Torture Law in 2009 is a significant improvement to the legal
environment in torture prevention in the Philippines. However, four
years since the law took effect the number of cases brought to court
against perpetrators remains a drop in the bucket.
The experiences of members
of the UATC-Philippines and other human rights groups from documented
torture cases e.g. Lenin Salas et al., Ronnel Victor R. Cabais and
Abdul-Khan Ajid, provides valuable information on some of the
obstacles faced by the authorities in implementing the Anti-Torture
Law. While some of the problems appear to be systemic others differ
from case to case. The main obstacles identified by the UATC-Philippines
are: delayed and ineffective investigations; problems in identifying
and locating perpetrators; access to prompt, thorough, impartial and
independent medical evaluation; and the risk of reprisals against
victims, witnesses and investigators.
These problems are
highlighted when one looks at the practical situation on the grounds
where there is lack of effective monitoring and reporting of cases of
torture cases and the lack of competence of authorities to effectively
investigate and prosecute these cases.
While the UATC-Philippines
recognizes the number of policy actions which the government had
undertaken such as the enactment of the Anti-Torture Law and the
ratification of the Optional Protocol to the Convention against
Torture (OPCAT), but none of these measures stands alone which
requires changes need to be made both at the legal and political
levels in order for the proper mechanism to be in place to prevent
torture and for survivors to even begin their pursuit of justice.
The UATC-Philippines urges
the CHRP to immediately convene the Oversight Committee (as mandated
by the Anti-Torture Law, Sec.20) in order to initiate reform in
ensuring effective implementation of the Anti-Torture Law, and to take
all necessary measures to implement its visitation mandate which
include unhampered and unrestrained access to all PNP detention
facilities, including those under the jurisdiction of the military.
The UATC-Philippines calls
on the PNP to fully comply with the Anti-Torture Law and to comply
with its “zero-tolerance” policy on the use of torture among all its
rank and file, and conduct inventory and inspection of all PNP
custodial facilities from regional, provincial, city to municipal
police units and lock-up cells nationwide.
The UATC-Philippines is
composed of more than thirty (30) human rights organizations led by
Amnesty International-Philippines, Balay Rehabilitation Center,
Families of Victims of Involuntary Disappearance (FIND), Medical
Action Group (MAG), and Task Force Detainees of the Philippines (TFDP).